Skip to main content

Enemies of Reason: Michele Bachmann

After an inexcusably long absence, I've returned today to my occasional series highlighting those people and organizations whose stances are not only in contradiction to reality but are so counter-factual as to be absurd. However, becoming an "Enemy of Reason", joining the ranks of such notables as Ken Ham, Conservapedia and Creation Moments, requires more than just the average brand of crazy. Being listed as an "Enemy of Reason" requires holding and promoting positions that are hopelessly irrational. Congresswoman Bachmann meets both of these qualifications.

Sometimes an Enemy of Reason is a one-issue person, someone who may otherwise be reasonable except on that one topic that, as soon as they open their mouth and talk about it, makes them seem crazy. Others are crazy on a number of different positions, and it is into this category that Bachmann falls.

The first position Michele Bachmann holds is support for the unscientific notion of Intelligent Design, thoroughly debunked by notable scientists like Ken Miller and embarrassed in court in the 2005 Dover Intelligent Design Trial with its prime spokesman Michael Behe reduced to incoherence on the witness stand. She rather famously declared that evolution was still a matter of "controversy" within the scientific community with "hundreds and hundreds of scientists", including some with Nobel Prizes, supporting Intelligent Design. Aside from the fact that this is a hideous lie, and the "scientists" who support I.D. are mostly those few "fellows" of the Discovery Institute, Bachmann hasn't even the decency to say a few names of scientists who do support Intelligent Design. A young man from Louisiana named Zack Kopplin, involved in fighting the Lousiana Science Education Act, has called Bachmann's bluff. Having over forty Nobel Prize winners signed up in support of his efforts to repeal the LSEA, Kopplin called for Bachmann to match his Nobels. He has forty-four Prize winners in support of evolution, and now he wants to know where her Nobel Prize winners who support I.D. are. So far, the reaction from Bachmann has been absolute silence. Worse, while a State Senator, Bachmann authored a bill similar to the LSEA, one that would have helped let creationism into the science classrooms of Minnesota.

If her opposition to evolution, in the face of all the good evidence for it, wasn't enough, Bachmann doesn't disappoint on climate change either. During the debate on the cap-and-trade bill in the House, Bachmann called the choice before them not one of saving the climate but a choice between liberty and "tyranny" while also making clear that she thinks global warming is a "hoax." She further rallied opposition to the bill outside the halls of Congress, calling on a radio show for the public to be "armed and dangerous" on the issue. In the same interview, she peddled the nonsense that the true cause of global warming isn't man-made but rather "solar flares, etc."As a candidate for U.S. President, Bachman has pledged to stop the EPA taking any action to regulate carbon dioxide as a pollutant, a last-ditch effort by the Obama Administration to get anything done to prevent catastrophic climate change in the face of GOP intransigence on the issue. All this in spite of the fact that the scientific community, especially those who deal with climatology, is largely in agreement that human activity is driving global warming.

As if all of this weren't bad enough, Bachmann continually promotes hatred and bigotry against homosexuals, saying that homosexuality is a "disorder", that gays are in "bondage" and that efforts to promote tolerance of gays in school are "child abuse." These and other quotes can be found here. Calling homosexuality a "choice", and an immoral one at that, completely ignores the reality. There is no substance to the idea that being gay is a choice, and for Bachmann to continue to push this line of ignorant bigotry is hateful and wrong. And while the Congresswoman has been off campaigning, spreading hatred against the LGBT community, nine teenagers have committed suicide in her district within the past two years, bullied for either being gay or simply being suspected of homosexuality. Her discourse on the topic, giving courage to anti-gay bullies everywhere, isn't just uninformed, it is deadly.

For using her national platform to promote the bad science of Intelligent Design and oppose the good science behind both evolution and climate change, for promoting hatred against the LGBT community through a constant stream of anti-gay rhetoric, Michele Bachmann is an Enemy of Reason. She not only needs a good education in science but also some lessons about being a Christian, for I'm told that being a Christian means exemplifying the love of Christ, and Bachmann hardly can claim to have done that. On a scale of one to ten, because of the fact that she is an enemy of reason on a number of fronts rather than one and because she has a national platform, Bachmann ranks an eight (ten being the highest possible score).

Comments

  1. You should look up "decision matrix" on google. You might find it a useful system for objectively placing people.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Film for Our Time

The jurors take a break in 12 Angry Men On the hottest day of the year, the trial of an eighteen year old boy for the murder of his father concludes--the jurors withdraw for deliberations, tasked with determining whether the defendant is guilty. If they agree, a death sentence will be handed down. The case seems an easy one, with the jury ready to reach a verdict in less than five minutes of deliberation, but one juror is not convinced. Over the objections of the others, he demands a recounting of the evidence presented, arguing that surely a man's life is worth more than a few moments' thought. Over the course of several hours, the jurors weigh the evidence of the case, and with it weightier issues of class, justice in the United States, and the intersection of the two. 12 Angry Men  remains relevant to us as we continue to deal with these issues nearly sixty years after the film's release. The great strength of the film lies in the fact that only two of the jur...

Endless Forms Most Bizarre

Anyone who knows me for more than ten minutes knows of my deep and abiding fondness for dinosaurs. It's a holdover from that phase most children go through, re-ignited during a summer class on the extinct beasts during college. Yet the drawback of being an adult who loves dinosaurs is readily apparent when you visit the shelves of your local library or bookstore. Most dinosaur books published are aimed at a far younger audience than myself, and the books for adults are often more technical works. Imagine my delight in seeing the newest book by John Pickrell waiting to be cataloged at my library! I placed a request for the book as quickly as I could pull out my smart phone, and I was not disappointed! Weird Dinosaurs: The Strange New Fossils Challenging Everything We Thought We Knew , is an excellent overview of many of the fascinating and bizarre new discoveries, and rediscoveries, of the past decade. A journalist and editor by trade, Pickrell is passionate about dinosaurs, ...

A Tale of Sound and Fury

Since the week before it was to be published, Michael Wolff's Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House  has been, by far, the most-talked about book in the country. The furor, prompted by an angry denunciation-by-tweet from the President, a cease and desist letter from his lawyers, and salacious details from the book making their way into the press, immediately catapulted it to bestseller status. Being a political junkie, of course I couldn't resist giving it a read. While the book sold out almost immediately in print, I was lucky enough to borrow the digital audiobook from my local public library. I rushed through it in just a few days - not only because of how engrossing it was, but also knowing that there were a lot of people waiting to read it after I was done. As enjoyable a read as Fire and Fury was, the deep irony of the book is that it would likely have received little attention had it not been for the attacks by the Trump Administration. In attempting to st...