Skip to main content

This Week in Creationism

Often I find that I'm overwhelmed by the sheer amount of output that the young-earth creationist organizations are capable of producing. I'm only one man, and even when I blogged more frequently I couldn't keep up with it. At most, I can deal with and dispense with a few articles from some of the major creationist organizations. This week I thought that I would take a different tack. Rather than focusing on a single article, I'm going to give a brief overview of some of the most recent articles coming out of Answers in Genesis, Creation Ministries and Creation Moments. Here we go...

Creation Ministries International: (home of the supposed "Unanswerable Questions" for Evolutionists and of the Hovind clan)

--Creation Ministries condemns the "framework hypothesis" as untenable in an article about history and pseudo-history. The framework hypothesis is one way of stating that Genesis 1-11 is literary rather than literal, and CMI won't stand for this. The irony that the link is titled "Pseudo-history" in an article that posits that Genesis is literal history is too rich for further commentary.

--CMI has released their 2012 "Creation Calendar" for purchase. With beautiful photographs, CMI tells you to give it to a friend and buy one for yourself (bulk discounts available) and see how the landscapes "confirm the truth of the Bible," by which they no doubt mean a literal Genesis. I know I can't wait to send them money for my copy!

Answers in Genesis: (home of the Creation Museum and Ken Ham, the missing link between idiots and creationists)

--Elizabeth Mitchell, that paragon of self-righteous ignorance, parrots creationist talking points on the evolution of language, asserts that the burial of a dinosaur nest is evidence for the Flood and mockingly states that Australopithecus sediba isn't a missing link at all, that the only missing links are those that exist in the minds of those who accept evolution in this week's News to Note. She also refers to Genesis as an "eyewitness account". Substitute "creationist" in place of "evolutionist" in Mitchell's statement, and I might just agree with her.

--Answers in Genesis wishes us all a Happy Thanksgiving, imploring us to remember its Christian origins and help spread the Gospel (dinosaurs on the Ark and all) to "unbelievers." I wonder if it would make Ken Ham upset to know that he enjoyed a nice Thanksgiving dinosaur for his meal...

Creation Moments: (home to scientific information gleaned from publications in the 1980's)

--Apparently the fact that the lunch of mastodons was preserved in their stomach is evidence of a young earth after all. Surely, the creationists think, the fact that the contents of a mastodon's lunch was preserved means the world must be quite young? But the fact that the mastodons were preserved by freezing speaks otherwise...this time, they don't even cite where their information came from in the first place.

--The fact that scientists can't agree on how the sun produces energy (news to most of us, certainly) is evidence that creationism is true, in the minds of Creation Ministries. In their mind, scientists want to think the sun is old because for evolution to be true they "need" it to be old. Alas for the creationists, the source for this moment is from 1989. Science, unlike creationism, has moved on since then.

This roundup wouldn't be complete without mention of what Ray Comfort (better known in some circles as "the banana man") is up to:

--the occasion of Thanksgiving is used by Comfort to shamelessly promote his anti-abortion movie and bash atheists who are, he thinks, thankful for nothing because they accept evolution. No real surprise there.

Thanks for staying with me on our whirlwind tour through the Wonderland of creationist news and views for the week. They're endlessly entertaining, aren't they?

Comments

  1. I really doubt he spoke to an atheist who "wasn't thankful for anything." Unless he some how twisted that out of "not thankful to god." In which case that statement would be true, but taken out of context. Creationists are retarded.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

A Film for Our Time

The jurors take a break in 12 Angry Men On the hottest day of the year, the trial of an eighteen year old boy for the murder of his father concludes--the jurors withdraw for deliberations, tasked with determining whether the defendant is guilty. If they agree, a death sentence will be handed down. The case seems an easy one, with the jury ready to reach a verdict in less than five minutes of deliberation, but one juror is not convinced. Over the objections of the others, he demands a recounting of the evidence presented, arguing that surely a man's life is worth more than a few moments' thought. Over the course of several hours, the jurors weigh the evidence of the case, and with it weightier issues of class, justice in the United States, and the intersection of the two. 12 Angry Men  remains relevant to us as we continue to deal with these issues nearly sixty years after the film's release. The great strength of the film lies in the fact that only two of the jur...

Endless Forms Most Bizarre

Anyone who knows me for more than ten minutes knows of my deep and abiding fondness for dinosaurs. It's a holdover from that phase most children go through, re-ignited during a summer class on the extinct beasts during college. Yet the drawback of being an adult who loves dinosaurs is readily apparent when you visit the shelves of your local library or bookstore. Most dinosaur books published are aimed at a far younger audience than myself, and the books for adults are often more technical works. Imagine my delight in seeing the newest book by John Pickrell waiting to be cataloged at my library! I placed a request for the book as quickly as I could pull out my smart phone, and I was not disappointed! Weird Dinosaurs: The Strange New Fossils Challenging Everything We Thought We Knew , is an excellent overview of many of the fascinating and bizarre new discoveries, and rediscoveries, of the past decade. A journalist and editor by trade, Pickrell is passionate about dinosaurs, ...

A Tale of Sound and Fury

Since the week before it was to be published, Michael Wolff's Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House  has been, by far, the most-talked about book in the country. The furor, prompted by an angry denunciation-by-tweet from the President, a cease and desist letter from his lawyers, and salacious details from the book making their way into the press, immediately catapulted it to bestseller status. Being a political junkie, of course I couldn't resist giving it a read. While the book sold out almost immediately in print, I was lucky enough to borrow the digital audiobook from my local public library. I rushed through it in just a few days - not only because of how engrossing it was, but also knowing that there were a lot of people waiting to read it after I was done. As enjoyable a read as Fire and Fury was, the deep irony of the book is that it would likely have received little attention had it not been for the attacks by the Trump Administration. In attempting to st...