Skip to main content

The Tipping Swindle

I hate the practice of tipping. Don't get me wrong, I tip every time I eat out, and I try to tip generously. I mostly eat alone when I do eat out, so I appreciate the friendly service I generally receive. But I find the idea of tipping the server as a normal part of their pay to be demeaning to them and nothing short of a swindle for the customer.

The debate over tipping can be acrimonious at times, and I can quite understand. Waiters and waitresses have plenty of stories about being stiffed by the customer after they work hard to ensure that the customer's time eating out is a pleasant experience, and anyone who has eaten out has an inevitable story about a bad experience with a server. But that's precisely the point. Food servers of all stripes work hard, let's be clear about that. They don't deserve the uncertainty that comes with a tipped minimum wage, and they certainly don't deserve to depend on the good graces of the customer for a large part of their take-home pay.

You may not know it, but while the federal minimum wage stands at $7.25 the minimum wage for tipped employees, including food servers, is just $2.13. It has remained at $2.13 since 1991, when it was raised a mere four cents. Of course, if the employee doesn't make enough between the tipped minimum wage and tips from customers to equal the federal minimum wage of $7.25, the employer is required to make up the difference, but let's be honest here. How many of us really think that restaurant managers dutifully pull out a calculator each week to make sure their employees are actually making that requirement? Why in the world would we permit such a system, little better than indentured servitude, where servers need to rely on customers to make up the majority of their wages, especially when tips can depend on factors out of the server's control (the food wasn't right) and irrelevant to the job (the customer didn't have any small bills to leave, and certainly didn't want to leave a ten dollar tip for a meal). In no other industry is this expected, and it is insulting to do this to waiters and waitresses who work just as hard as anyone making the federal minimum wage in retail, if not harder.

Further, this is a swindle for customers, who are forced to subsidize a restaurant industry that is simply unwilling to pay their workers a decent wage, by and large, and who have stubbornly resisted efforts to bring the tipped minimum wage in line with the regular federal minimum wage. Tips should be for great service, not because we feel guilty about the fact that the server is working for a poverty rate. Tips should be a truly optional extra, not a standard add-on to the cost of a meal, a social obligation. It should be up to the restaurant, not the customer, to make sure that the server is paid a decent wage. Everyone who goes out to eat helps to subsidize the restaurant industry's labor practices, and this is especially disgusting when it occurs in larger, highly-profitable restaurant chains. It could certainly be argued that raising the tipped minimum wage would lead to higher menu prices, and I'm fine with that. I would rather pay slightly-higher prices for restaurant food if it means knowing that the staff are better-paid, and I would further argue that the idea that we should be fine with paying servers an absurdly low wage in exchange for lower lunch prices is immoral.

No longer should servers have to depend on the caprice of their customers for the majority of their wages, and no longer should customers be forced to provide an artificial subsidy to the restaurant industry. It is an obscenity that in a society with so much wealth, we demand an entire class of workers accept a low rate of pay in exchange for the promise of tips that would bring their pay in line with what they should have been making from the beginning. It's time to end the practice of tipping as a standard part of a meal, and bring the minimum wage of tipped employees in line with the federal minimum wage.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Film for Our Time

The jurors take a break in 12 Angry Men On the hottest day of the year, the trial of an eighteen year old boy for the murder of his father concludes--the jurors withdraw for deliberations, tasked with determining whether the defendant is guilty. If they agree, a death sentence will be handed down. The case seems an easy one, with the jury ready to reach a verdict in less than five minutes of deliberation, but one juror is not convinced. Over the objections of the others, he demands a recounting of the evidence presented, arguing that surely a man's life is worth more than a few moments' thought. Over the course of several hours, the jurors weigh the evidence of the case, and with it weightier issues of class, justice in the United States, and the intersection of the two. 12 Angry Men  remains relevant to us as we continue to deal with these issues nearly sixty years after the film's release. The great strength of the film lies in the fact that only two of the jur...

Endless Forms Most Bizarre

Anyone who knows me for more than ten minutes knows of my deep and abiding fondness for dinosaurs. It's a holdover from that phase most children go through, re-ignited during a summer class on the extinct beasts during college. Yet the drawback of being an adult who loves dinosaurs is readily apparent when you visit the shelves of your local library or bookstore. Most dinosaur books published are aimed at a far younger audience than myself, and the books for adults are often more technical works. Imagine my delight in seeing the newest book by John Pickrell waiting to be cataloged at my library! I placed a request for the book as quickly as I could pull out my smart phone, and I was not disappointed! Weird Dinosaurs: The Strange New Fossils Challenging Everything We Thought We Knew , is an excellent overview of many of the fascinating and bizarre new discoveries, and rediscoveries, of the past decade. A journalist and editor by trade, Pickrell is passionate about dinosaurs, ...

A Tale of Sound and Fury

Since the week before it was to be published, Michael Wolff's Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House  has been, by far, the most-talked about book in the country. The furor, prompted by an angry denunciation-by-tweet from the President, a cease and desist letter from his lawyers, and salacious details from the book making their way into the press, immediately catapulted it to bestseller status. Being a political junkie, of course I couldn't resist giving it a read. While the book sold out almost immediately in print, I was lucky enough to borrow the digital audiobook from my local public library. I rushed through it in just a few days - not only because of how engrossing it was, but also knowing that there were a lot of people waiting to read it after I was done. As enjoyable a read as Fire and Fury was, the deep irony of the book is that it would likely have received little attention had it not been for the attacks by the Trump Administration. In attempting to st...