Skip to main content

Our Media Has Failed Us

If there was any doubt that American media has become the equivalent of a babbling idiot, the past month should have thoroughly erased it. The coverage of the outbreak of Ebola, and the small number of cases that have been diagnosed in this country, should prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that our news outlets have lost their minds. In the face of this disease, novel and thus frightening in this country, the public needs facts rather than intense speculation, but what they have been given by our media can hardly be considered the level headed presentation of facts that we need. Instead, we've been treated to ridiculous speculation about how a larger outbreak could happen, like conservative darling Dr. Ben Carson being given a platform on Fox News to spread his idiotic ramblings:



Little better, CNN brought on fiction author Robin Cook to hype fear about the disease, calling his fiction work Outbreak "prophetic" and giving him a forum to question whether the CDC was lying about Ebola. This is the kind of irresponsible journalism that causes people like me to lose faith in our media, to stop watching their broadcasts and reading their news online. In search of better ratings, they've abandoned their duty to provide news that informs and assures the populace during this time. Instead, they help to stir up fears, encourage the spread of ridiculous conspiracy theories, and degrade confidence in our medical capabilities.  

Yet this is hardly the first time our media has failed us. The institution that was meant to inform the public about the reality of the world we live in, and act as a watchdog to the powerful, has failed us again and again. As Mark Leibovich so devastatingly portrayed in his book This Town, the media has become the lapdog of the powerful, with journalists fawning over political and business leaders rather than asking the hard questions that need to be asked. Our media acted as cheerleaders for the debacle in Iraq, being thoroughly played by the likes of Cheney and Rumsfeld. Instead of questioning and probing the presented rationale for the war, many figures in the news media joined in beating the drum. Very few had the good sense to even question this rush to battle. Even worse, having learned nothing from this lesson, they continue to give press to the same architects who failed us in Iraq, bringing them on to ask them questions about Syria and Iraq, treating them as serious minds whose opinions need to be considered, when their glaring failures in the second Iraq War should disqualify them from being taken seriously ever again. 

In a misguided sense of fairness, the news media allows proponents of anti-scientific viewpoints a platform to spread their lies. In the continuing "debate" about global warming, which is no longer a debate in the scientific community, global warming deniers are allowed to spread arguments that have frequently been debunked in the interest of providing "balance." In so doing, the media perpetuate the idea that a host of scientific issues are still hotly debated in the scientific community, from climate change and evolution to vaccines, when in reality there is a wide consensus on these issues among scientists. The public, looking to our news media for answers, instead gets a misguided view of the world. These few examples hardly begin to cover the range of issues that the media fails in accurately covering. Most news outlets consistently fail to seek accurate information on a host of issues, and fail to challenge guests and commentators who make false and misleading statements. 

This is well beyond the typical debates over whether the news media are biased either liberally or conservatively. This is a central failing of those whose job is to inform, and thus guide and protect, our society, a failure to accurately report what is happening in our world. If media viewership is in decline in the United States, our news outlets have only themselves to blame. When we increasingly turn to alternate media outlets who, in spite of fewer resources, somehow manage to still provide better, more accurate coverage of issues, when half-hour comedy news shows provide better investigative reporting than the major networks, we know that our media has failed us. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

A Film for Our Time

The jurors take a break in 12 Angry Men On the hottest day of the year, the trial of an eighteen year old boy for the murder of his father concludes--the jurors withdraw for deliberations, tasked with determining whether the defendant is guilty. If they agree, a death sentence will be handed down. The case seems an easy one, with the jury ready to reach a verdict in less than five minutes of deliberation, but one juror is not convinced. Over the objections of the others, he demands a recounting of the evidence presented, arguing that surely a man's life is worth more than a few moments' thought. Over the course of several hours, the jurors weigh the evidence of the case, and with it weightier issues of class, justice in the United States, and the intersection of the two. 12 Angry Men  remains relevant to us as we continue to deal with these issues nearly sixty years after the film's release. The great strength of the film lies in the fact that only two of the jur...

Endless Forms Most Bizarre

Anyone who knows me for more than ten minutes knows of my deep and abiding fondness for dinosaurs. It's a holdover from that phase most children go through, re-ignited during a summer class on the extinct beasts during college. Yet the drawback of being an adult who loves dinosaurs is readily apparent when you visit the shelves of your local library or bookstore. Most dinosaur books published are aimed at a far younger audience than myself, and the books for adults are often more technical works. Imagine my delight in seeing the newest book by John Pickrell waiting to be cataloged at my library! I placed a request for the book as quickly as I could pull out my smart phone, and I was not disappointed! Weird Dinosaurs: The Strange New Fossils Challenging Everything We Thought We Knew , is an excellent overview of many of the fascinating and bizarre new discoveries, and rediscoveries, of the past decade. A journalist and editor by trade, Pickrell is passionate about dinosaurs, ...

A Tale of Sound and Fury

Since the week before it was to be published, Michael Wolff's Fire and Fury: Inside the Trump White House  has been, by far, the most-talked about book in the country. The furor, prompted by an angry denunciation-by-tweet from the President, a cease and desist letter from his lawyers, and salacious details from the book making their way into the press, immediately catapulted it to bestseller status. Being a political junkie, of course I couldn't resist giving it a read. While the book sold out almost immediately in print, I was lucky enough to borrow the digital audiobook from my local public library. I rushed through it in just a few days - not only because of how engrossing it was, but also knowing that there were a lot of people waiting to read it after I was done. As enjoyable a read as Fire and Fury was, the deep irony of the book is that it would likely have received little attention had it not been for the attacks by the Trump Administration. In attempting to st...