Skip to main content

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind).

But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all life is descended from either one or a few original forms of life. All life is related; we know this from genetics, from the DNA that is within all of us. We see the process of evolution in bacteria acquiring new abilities from the ability to digest nylon to antibiotic resistance. We see the process of evolution in, ironically, the developing resistance of weeds to our industrial pesticides. We see evolution in the ability of chimpanzees (our closest living relatives) to use tools as we learned to do, in the immense and changing variety of dog breeds, all derived from a single wild ancestor. We see it in the development of kale, brussel sprouts, cabbage and kohlrabi, all from a single wild plant. We see it in the fossil record, as whole classes of species rose to dominance, diversified and fell away...and in the fact that there is a definite progression in the fossil record, over millions of years. Humans do not exist with dinosaurs; rabbits aren't found on the level with dimetrodon, trilobites and chimps don't happen in the same strata. Evolution explains this; creationism tries to explain it away with silly stories of "hydraulic sorting."

Below is what is known as the phylogenetic tree of life. It charts the inter-relatedness of all species on the planet; there are better images out there, available in a larger size, but from the design alone, it's clear. All life is related. Evolution explains this. Evolution is based on the evidence that we have available now. It isn't a made-up "fairy tale for grown-ups" as Ray Comfort likes to think. We have to operate based on evidence, because we live in the real world and have to deal with it. The recognition that there is evidence supporting evolution is the first step to accepting it, and I encourage you to seek that information out and learn about it, because the theory of evolution reveals the majestic story of life on earth, the story that is ultimately about all of us and our place in the world.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Unanswerable Questions" for Evolution Part One

Creation Ministries International has launched a new initiative, which seems a lot like all the other creationists blitzkriegs before it. With the wonderfully creative tagline of "Question Evolution", CMI intends to challenge "evolutionists" and their "indoctrination" of high school students with the supposed dogma of evolution. They also aim to  cut the population of atheists by half , presumably by challenging the "faith" that every atheist (and only atheists, no "real Christians") is supposed to hold in Darwin's great idea. The main thrust of this is a tract with fifteen "unanswerable" questions for evolutionists. I'm done putting quotation marks around the word, evolutionists; from here on out I ask my readers to recognize that it is a creationist term that is about as silly as calling someone a general relativist (accepts general relativity) or germist (for accepting germ theory). Regardless, CMI seems just as i...

The Absurdity/Agony of War

Science writer Mary Roach is never one to shy away from parts of science that verge on the absurd, as anyone who has read any of her books surely knows. I'd read two of her previous books, and been enchanted enough by Roach's unique combination of endless curiosity and a wry sense of humor that I rushed to lay my hands on her newest book. Grunt: The Curious Science of Humans at War will not fail in living up to the expectations that fans of her work will bring. Those who have never read her before will be hard-pressed to put down a book that I finished in a few short days.  The real joy of reading something by Mary Roach is her talent for seeking out strange areas of science that a reader might never have known about. As an investigator, she answers questions you never knew you had. Her newest work   is no exception. We discover, for instance, how the military tests the ability of a fighter jet to survive a mid-air collision with a large bird--by firing a dead chicken...