Skip to main content

Creationist Conference..."Creation not Confusion"

Creation Ministries International is having a conference coming up this year in September. Called "Creation not Confusion", an ironic title if there ever was one, it will feature the notorious creationist Dr. Jonathan Sarfati, who answered Richard Dawkin's The Greatest Show on Earth with the resounding propaganda tract The Greatest Hoax on Earth. Sarfati is also the author of Evolution Refuted, which the website claims is the best-selling creationist book of all time (no one tell Ken Ham), though, save for the associated paycheck, that is a dubious honor. The other speaker, Gary Bates, is the current head of Creation Ministries International, and I have to admit that until today I'd never heard of him, but in fact, though the website offers nothing about his educational background, we may surmise that he does not have a PhD given the fact that creationists love nothing more than adding their letters after their name on a book (as Sarfati does). It is as though their intellectual insecurity is manifested by continually having to remind everyone that they too have a PhD; after all, when most scientists publish books, they feel no need to add their letters immediately after their name on the front cover.

Regardless of who the speakers are, the list of upcoming talks during the conference (held in a church in Oklahoma) is revealing in that one is likely to get nothing new here. No new arguments and certainly no evidence. Take a look at the list, and you see the very same topics we usually get. The "icons of evolution" are false, compromise is wrong, design in nature, etc. They are arguments that have been endlessly refuted; scientists admit that Haekel was wrong, so stop pretending like science thinks that he is right. The design we see in nature is an illusion of design, in fact the product of endless evolution that ensures that species are compatible with their environment. The answers to all the arguments and questions that creationists raise are out there, available to anyone with access to the Internet or a library card, answers that are supported by evidence, not an appeal to authority or requests to "just believe." We needn't believe when we have evidence.

As always, with prominent, credentialed men like Sarfati, I do wonder whether they actually believe what they say, or whether they speak out of a desire to believe what they want to be true, a mistaken belief that being a Christian requires denying science. Do they suppose that when they meet the Savior they profess belief in, as they think they will, that he will congratulate them for ignoring every piece of evidence that pointed to the reality of earth's history? Or will he instead condemn them for their lies?

Creationism is the very opposite of the title of this conference; they exist to spread confusion and doubt where there is none. Creationism is confusion.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Unanswerable Questions" for Evolution Part One

Creation Ministries International has launched a new initiative, which seems a lot like all the other creationists blitzkriegs before it. With the wonderfully creative tagline of "Question Evolution", CMI intends to challenge "evolutionists" and their "indoctrination" of high school students with the supposed dogma of evolution. They also aim to  cut the population of atheists by half , presumably by challenging the "faith" that every atheist (and only atheists, no "real Christians") is supposed to hold in Darwin's great idea. The main thrust of this is a tract with fifteen "unanswerable" questions for evolutionists. I'm done putting quotation marks around the word, evolutionists; from here on out I ask my readers to recognize that it is a creationist term that is about as silly as calling someone a general relativist (accepts general relativity) or germist (for accepting germ theory). Regardless, CMI seems just as i...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...

The Absurdity/Agony of War

Science writer Mary Roach is never one to shy away from parts of science that verge on the absurd, as anyone who has read any of her books surely knows. I'd read two of her previous books, and been enchanted enough by Roach's unique combination of endless curiosity and a wry sense of humor that I rushed to lay my hands on her newest book. Grunt: The Curious Science of Humans at War will not fail in living up to the expectations that fans of her work will bring. Those who have never read her before will be hard-pressed to put down a book that I finished in a few short days.  The real joy of reading something by Mary Roach is her talent for seeking out strange areas of science that a reader might never have known about. As an investigator, she answers questions you never knew you had. Her newest work   is no exception. We discover, for instance, how the military tests the ability of a fighter jet to survive a mid-air collision with a large bird--by firing a dead chicken...