Skip to main content

A Student Wants Advice

A student wrote to Answers in Genesis for advice. What he got was the sophistry, bad-arguments and muddle-headed thinking that so characterizes that organization. The exchange is fine amusement, if one is in the mood to simply laugh at nonsense rather than feel the anger that often accompanies the attempts of the anti-science crowd to lie, distort and malign evolution. The student in question is afraid of majoring in science because of the "stigma" a young-earth creationist would get from the "Darwinist camp." Already, I'm saddened to see a student so interested in science have his enthusiasm tempered in the name of fundamentalist dogma.

The authors of the article, two of the lesser lights of Answers in Genesis apparently, whom I've never heard of before, responded with a lengthy article, part advice and part delusion. They first recommend that this student consider attending one of the AiG-approved colleges where young-earth creationism is taught as science (the late Jerry Falwell's Liberty University is specifically mentioned by name--he continues to haunt our society). Barring that, they recommend that he not stimulate argument--one would hate to see his misconceptions shredded by the facts--but all the same be ready to defend the creationist interpretation of the Bible.

"Through your biblical worldview, filter everything you learn," they tell the student, disregarding the fact that this isn't how science works. Facts about the world are not run through the Bible, Koran, Torah, War and Peace, Lord of the Rings, or any other book to test their validity, they are tested in the field, on the chalkboard or in the laboratory. I can think of no better recipe for a student to emerge ill-educated from college than to tell him to keep a closed mind as they go, and this is exactly what these authors are telling him.

This student is told to keep "God's Word" (and whenever creationists use this phrase, they mean their own literalist interpretation of Genesis) in mind as he studies science. Because obviously we don't want "scary science" dispelling the stories of Genesis about forbidden fruit, global floods and nine hundred year old men.

What is so tragic in Answers in Genesis' continuing quest to destroy science education in this country, both at an individual and societal level, are students like the one who wrote this letter, students who love science but are ill-served by Ken Ham's flights of fancy. They fear science, hate it unless it confirms their preconceived beliefs about the world. And when it doesn't, they lie and distort to their flock.

The world, and the universe, in which we exist is an amazing place. Look at the fossils we have in museums, watch the leaves turn red and orange as autumn progresses; look to the sky at night and see the moon and the stars. Read a book about paleontology or physics. The world is full of wonder, and we do ourselves no favor by being blind to the reality of it. These purveyers of lies tell us to suspend our reason, to keep our minds closed and narrow. They fear the truth, in spite of their protestations to the contrary, when they have no need to.

See the world with open eyes. You won't regret it.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Unanswerable Questions" for Evolution Part One

Creation Ministries International has launched a new initiative, which seems a lot like all the other creationists blitzkriegs before it. With the wonderfully creative tagline of "Question Evolution", CMI intends to challenge "evolutionists" and their "indoctrination" of high school students with the supposed dogma of evolution. They also aim to  cut the population of atheists by half , presumably by challenging the "faith" that every atheist (and only atheists, no "real Christians") is supposed to hold in Darwin's great idea. The main thrust of this is a tract with fifteen "unanswerable" questions for evolutionists. I'm done putting quotation marks around the word, evolutionists; from here on out I ask my readers to recognize that it is a creationist term that is about as silly as calling someone a general relativist (accepts general relativity) or germist (for accepting germ theory). Regardless, CMI seems just as i...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...

The Absurdity/Agony of War

Science writer Mary Roach is never one to shy away from parts of science that verge on the absurd, as anyone who has read any of her books surely knows. I'd read two of her previous books, and been enchanted enough by Roach's unique combination of endless curiosity and a wry sense of humor that I rushed to lay my hands on her newest book. Grunt: The Curious Science of Humans at War will not fail in living up to the expectations that fans of her work will bring. Those who have never read her before will be hard-pressed to put down a book that I finished in a few short days.  The real joy of reading something by Mary Roach is her talent for seeking out strange areas of science that a reader might never have known about. As an investigator, she answers questions you never knew you had. Her newest work   is no exception. We discover, for instance, how the military tests the ability of a fighter jet to survive a mid-air collision with a large bird--by firing a dead chicken...