Skip to main content

The Party of Avarice, the Party of Cruelty

It's no great secret that I used to vote straight-Republican in nearly every election. I was proud to vote for the party of individual responsibility and small government, as I saw it then, as opposed to what I viewed as the party of dependency and the nanny state. But the GOP I used to vote for isn't the same one, and I've changed myself. We parted ways several elections ago, and at this point I cannot bring myself to vote for a single Republican in any election, from the local representatives all the way up through to the Presidency. The Republican Party is, to put it at its mildest, a party driven by greed and by hostility to all those who are unlike themselves. They are the party of Avarice and the party of Cruelty, and they show this in their every word and their every action.

The singular accomplishment of the modern GOP is the fusion of pro-corporate economics with radical religious fundamentalism. Both are toxic to the freedoms and liberties of the citizens of the United States. In the reckoning of the GOP, the private sector is not only good but infallible, able to do no wrong and to fix all ills. We see this fantasy in both ends of the Republican Party, from the Tea Party fringe to the supposedly respectable economic libertarians. This philosophy leads to attacks on anything perceived as hostile to the unfettered free market, from unions and environmental regulations to taxes. The destruction of the environment and the middle class is shrugged off as unimportant when compared to maximizing corporate profits, and any additional taxes or regulations are fought with vigor, consequences be damned. 

At the same time, as if these concessions were not enough, the GOP fights to give ever-more to already profitable corporations. It isn't enough that they pay very few taxes; politicians from the Right are happy to give them even more through grotesque subsidies and inexcusable tax loopholes that have let corporations like GE pay almost nothing in taxes and netted billions for the oil giants. This charity does not extend far beyond the corporations. The GOP fights hard against even modest tax increases on the very wealthy, but they don't have a bit of concern for those who are neither wealthy nor a corporation. While they've fought for tax loopholes and subsidies for the rich, the rest of the country must bear the full weight of the push for austerity. While agricultural corporations rake in millions in subsidies, food stamp recipients see their benefits cut. While the insanely low tax rates stock market brokers pay on their income is defended, Republicans are happy to cut subsidies for education, leading to the poor and middle class going deeper into debt for a degree and thousands of teachers and other education personnel losing their jobs. Their indifference to the needs of those who are not rich marks their philosophy as a cruel one, callous in its disregard of the most economically vulnerable. These are the skewed economic priorities of the Republicans; those who have receive more, while those who have not receive even less, leading to skyrocketing inequality, damaging both to our economy and our republic.

On the other side, today's Republican Party is solidly in the way of basic human and civil rights as a consequence of their union with the Religious Right. The overwhelming majority of the opposition to full equality for gays and lesbians comes from the Republican Party. Across the country, attacks on reproductive rights--not just abortion but even access to contraception--comes from the political Right, the Party that worships at the alter of the fetus but cares nothing for those who have already been born. Attacks on voting rights, attacks aimed at female and minority voters who tend to lean Democratic, is universally a Republican phenomenon, from Texas to North Carolina to Pennsylvania. The current stances of the Republican Party put them completely at odds with basic civil rights and even basic human dignity, as they attack and vilify everyone unlike themselves. They stump for special privileges for Christianity, refusing to recognize the separation of church and state when it benefits themselves--but are quick to deny this same special treatment to any religion that is not their own. 

The GOP is at odds with reality itself, not just in its economics or in its hysteria over gay rights. Much of the opposition to the teaching of evolution comes from Republicans (the rest is, sadly, from a handful of Democrats in rural or conservative areas). The denial of climate change is almost-entirely a Republican position, from conservative think tanks like Americans for Prosperity to vocal climate deniers like Senator Inhofe. The basic science underlying climate change is solid, and while scientists continue to debate the details of climate change they are near-unanimous in their agreement that it is occurring and that it is caused by human carbon emissions. But the Republican Party denies this and obstructs any effort to change the path we are on. We will pay a dear price for their intransigence on this issue. 

The list of the Republican Party's missteps and problems is far longer than this, and each point could be broken down into a more detailed discussion of the issue. While the Democratic Party is far from perfect, and itself too often falls prey to the corporatism that animates the GOP, they are infinitely preferable to the party of the rich, the party of bigotry and hatred, the party that tries to rig elections when they can no longer win on the issues. It is a Party animated by greed and totally without conscience, a Party that any reasonable person should be absolutely ashamed to vote for, one that I never again will cast a ballot for until and unless they change their ways, which they show no signs of doing. In a time where we need humanity to draw upon its best instincts, our instincts for tolerance and compassion, the Republican Party plays upon the worst instincts of humanity, and this is the real tragedy. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Unanswerable Questions" for Evolution Part One

Creation Ministries International has launched a new initiative, which seems a lot like all the other creationists blitzkriegs before it. With the wonderfully creative tagline of "Question Evolution", CMI intends to challenge "evolutionists" and their "indoctrination" of high school students with the supposed dogma of evolution. They also aim to  cut the population of atheists by half , presumably by challenging the "faith" that every atheist (and only atheists, no "real Christians") is supposed to hold in Darwin's great idea. The main thrust of this is a tract with fifteen "unanswerable" questions for evolutionists. I'm done putting quotation marks around the word, evolutionists; from here on out I ask my readers to recognize that it is a creationist term that is about as silly as calling someone a general relativist (accepts general relativity) or germist (for accepting germ theory). Regardless, CMI seems just as i...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...

The Absurdity/Agony of War

Science writer Mary Roach is never one to shy away from parts of science that verge on the absurd, as anyone who has read any of her books surely knows. I'd read two of her previous books, and been enchanted enough by Roach's unique combination of endless curiosity and a wry sense of humor that I rushed to lay my hands on her newest book. Grunt: The Curious Science of Humans at War will not fail in living up to the expectations that fans of her work will bring. Those who have never read her before will be hard-pressed to put down a book that I finished in a few short days.  The real joy of reading something by Mary Roach is her talent for seeking out strange areas of science that a reader might never have known about. As an investigator, she answers questions you never knew you had. Her newest work   is no exception. We discover, for instance, how the military tests the ability of a fighter jet to survive a mid-air collision with a large bird--by firing a dead chicken...