Skip to main content

Making a Difference

When I went to my book club last week, I was looking forward to discussing the Anita Shreve novel that had been selected, a book that was interestingly written even if the story itself was a little dull for me. The way our book club is set up is that each of us takes a turn talking about what we thought about the book and got out of it, and with the diversity of people there, ranging from a retired German teacher, an old Presbyterian minister, to a local artist, the discussion is always interesting. But what was most striking for me this time was the response to the book from a member of the group who spoke very little about the novel itself. Instead, he talked about how when he lived in California he walked several miles to the library to take out books, how he treasured them, how a handful of books that he had taken out of the library changed his life. It really turned out to be a profound mediation on the power of books to alter a life in the most surprising ways. 

Where I work, it's far too easy to get bogged down in some of the less glamorous details of the job, from seemingly endless paperwork and staying within budget, to dealing with problem patrons who don't seem to want to play by the set rules. It is easy then to miss the larger point of what I do, of what everyone who works in a library does, from the front desk staff, to the children's librarian, to the librarians who work in the background and are rarely seen by the public, like catalogers and other technical services staff. Every librarian, every person who works in a library, from the small public libraries like mine to school libraries, research libraries and university libraries, is making a difference in ways we ourselves may not understand. The story told by the member of the book club last week was a powerful reminder of the fact that what we do changes lives in real and meaningful ways. We often never see the results of what we do in the longer term, as people pass in and out of our libraries and we ourselves transition from job to job, but we should never lose sight of the fact  that what we do has value and purpose. We can never know when a program we run or a book we add to the collection will go on to make a difference in someone's life. 

Lots of authors have talked about how important libraries were to them growing up, including Neil Gaiman and Ray Bradbury, but you need not be a famous writer to have had your life changed by a good library. Growing up in a rural area, devoid of culture and competing viewpoints, libraries for me were salvation from the boredom of everyday life, a place to open and educate a closed mind. My little public library was (and is still!) an oasis in an intellectual desert, staffed and managed by kind, helpful people. I read a lot, both fiction and nonfiction throughout the library, developing a habit which has served me well in the years since. Without that library I can say with near-certainty that my life would be quite different from what it is now, and not in a good way. Things I learned growing up and using that library are still useful to me years later. Working now in a small public library, also in a rural area, I reflect on that from time to time, and it inspires me to do the best job I can do, to provide a little library of quality for the members of this community. Rural areas need, and deserve, good libraries to help nourish those who would otherwise wither without it. It doesn't matter if most of the people coming in only take out DVDs or light fiction reads--we are still meeting a need. We are making a difference in the communities we serve in myriad ways. And for one or two people, what we do just might change their lives. 

Comments

  1. What you so correctly say about the importance of libraries applies also to teachers, who may never know the positive impacts (and, alas, negative ones too) they may have on their students. How strange it is that professions that can have such important impacts are now under fire from so-called "conservaties." No bottom line, no immediate feedback, inadequate (or abusive) measures to "prove" their worth, these professions are facing an uncertain future. We should, instead, be celebrating them.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Today I Am Ashamed of My Alma Mater

Over a week ago, my alma mater, Clarion University of Pennsylvania, released what it touted as a "bold" and "ambitious" workforce plan for the next several years. The backlash was both strong and immediate, forcing the University Administration, currently headed by President Karen Whitney, to release a " Frequently Asked Questions " for its plan. The outrage on social media, as well as a MoveOn.org petition with several thousand signatures, doubtless have already channeled the displeasure of the community, alumni, and students with the plan. The University is accepting public feedback, but this seems to be only a political window-dressing for a plan that Whitney herself was  quoted  as saying "...is 95-98% a done deal." For over a week I debated over what form a blog on the topic would take, and while I realize that what I have to say here is little different from what I and others have already stated elsewhere, I feel the need to address thi...

How I Left Creationism

There is a discussion going on right now in the science community about whether or not we should debate creationists: it is a debate within a debate, if you will. There are good arguments on both sides, but I have to think that we should debate creationists, and we should do it as often as we can stand it. Why do I think this? Last week, I saw that Michael Shermer posted a link to a story of a woman who argued this very point. As a former creationist, it was going to debates between Shermer and Kent Hovind that began to convince her of the legitimacy of evolution and of science. I too was once a creationist. Without ever having read anything about it, without it ever having been mentioned in class (I never heard a word about evolution in high school), I was ready to pounce at the merest mention of the topic as false and godless, two of the favorite creationist talking-points. I look back at this self in amazement, at how ignorant and proud of that ignorance I was, how I failed to ...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...