Skip to main content

The "Green Dragon"

Perhaps I'll start with this one. I shouldn't be surprised, I'm sure, but I still am regardless. At just the time we need to bring everyone in to address this issue, radicals from the "religious right" step in to act as corporate lackeys to cloud the issue. Watch this video.


Yes, that's right. Environmentalism is a false god that will destroy your Christian faith, bring down God, indoctrinate your children, establish global governance, turn us all into pagans, and so on and so forth. It's hard to find a place to begin attacking the stupidity and wrong-headed assumptions about this video. Just when people start to grown concerned about the state of the environment, the useful idiots are sent in to assure us that, it's ok, don't recycle, keep driving your Hummer, dump oil in the Gulf, whatever. Just don't worry, because God gave us dominion over the earth and we can do whatever the heck we want because God will take care of us.
Well, a person is perfectly free to believe that rubbish, but how about showing some concern, taking simple action, just in case God decides to let humanity swing in the wind because of our actions? She mentions "environmental stewardship," but disregards it entirely after that. The good steward doesn't just throw up their hands and say, "Oh well, I'll just do whatever and hope everything works out ok," they actively work to ensure a good end.
We are faced with very real problems, problems that require informed action. These problems will not just go away because we collectively decide to ignore them, and misinformed opinions from these morons certainly won't help. Recycle, turn off the lights when you leave the room, walk somewhere instead of driving if possible, perhaps consider taking a shorter shower or not using plastic bags. Hey, maybe even write your Senator in support of wind energy. I'm sure it won't make Jesus mad if you do, and it certainly won't turn you into a goddess-worshiping pagan.

Comments

  1. It's too bad they can't think about the Earth for what it is. An island in a sea of inhospitable ocean. Once it's ruined, there isn't any fixing it.

    All their confidence in God notwithstanding, I'd rather we be cautious and not poison the only planet we have.

    It's almost like this Christian dismissal of environmental responsibility is some kind of knee jerk reaction to Al Gore or something. He's a Democrat and we all know someone who is a Democrat is only out to destroy their "values".

    It's like all the negativity about Obama. No matter what he does, they have to oppose it, just because he doesn't have an (R) behind his name. John McCain could have won and done exactly the same things Obama has, and they'd be cheering that "Godly values" were being upheld. It's a sorry case of knee jerk opposition, facts be damned.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Wow, these people are so stupid.

    Even if you assume there is a God and that that God did give us dominion over the Earth, it's still stupid.

    If God did give us that Dominion, just like he would have supposedly given us free will and desired for us to use it wisely, it would want us to do the same for the Earth.

    There is neither rhyme nor reason behind them.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Unanswerable Questions" for Evolution Part One

Creation Ministries International has launched a new initiative, which seems a lot like all the other creationists blitzkriegs before it. With the wonderfully creative tagline of "Question Evolution", CMI intends to challenge "evolutionists" and their "indoctrination" of high school students with the supposed dogma of evolution. They also aim to  cut the population of atheists by half , presumably by challenging the "faith" that every atheist (and only atheists, no "real Christians") is supposed to hold in Darwin's great idea. The main thrust of this is a tract with fifteen "unanswerable" questions for evolutionists. I'm done putting quotation marks around the word, evolutionists; from here on out I ask my readers to recognize that it is a creationist term that is about as silly as calling someone a general relativist (accepts general relativity) or germist (for accepting germ theory). Regardless, CMI seems just as i...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...

The Absurdity/Agony of War

Science writer Mary Roach is never one to shy away from parts of science that verge on the absurd, as anyone who has read any of her books surely knows. I'd read two of her previous books, and been enchanted enough by Roach's unique combination of endless curiosity and a wry sense of humor that I rushed to lay my hands on her newest book. Grunt: The Curious Science of Humans at War will not fail in living up to the expectations that fans of her work will bring. Those who have never read her before will be hard-pressed to put down a book that I finished in a few short days.  The real joy of reading something by Mary Roach is her talent for seeking out strange areas of science that a reader might never have known about. As an investigator, she answers questions you never knew you had. Her newest work   is no exception. We discover, for instance, how the military tests the ability of a fighter jet to survive a mid-air collision with a large bird--by firing a dead chicken...