Skip to main content

Why Museums Matter

Yesterday afternoon, I was pleased to finish Richard Fortey's excellent book Dry Storeroom No. 1 detailing the behind-the-scenes workings of the Natural History Museum in Great Britain. Sounds like it would be a deathly dull book, doesn't it? In the deft hands of Fortey, however, nothing could be further from the truth!

Richard Fortey is just the man to pen a book on this topic; not only is he an excellent writer (Trilobite! is another good example of his prose), but he has also spent his entire career at the NHM and has the view that can only be provided by an insider such as he. Retired since 2006, Fortey was the expert on trilobites for the museum, and his exposition of the inner workings of the institution are simple amazing. He proceeds in steps through the different divisions of the museum, mingling personal reflections with stories of the many, often colorful, characters who have worked there over the years and discussions of the history and work of each department.

The picture he provides is one of an institution in flux since the Thatcher years, when it was decided that everything should be run as a business; the consequences for the Museum itself are not completely apparent yet, but some decisions were absolutely disastrous for the mission of the institution.

The common thread that runs through the book is a vigorous defense of the institution of museums. Their mission and purpose may seem strange and unnecessary to an entire class of politicians and petty bureaucrats, but it is very clear to those within the profession of science and the educated public. Museums are a place to collect and preserve knowledge of the natural world, to push the frontiers of that knowledge and act as repositories of worlds that are fast vanishing in nature. Research that seems "useless" and odd specialties can, in a moment, turn out to mean the entire world, the literal difference between life and death for millions (read the section on the screw worm, if you think I exaggerate!).

That's a lesson that matters in this country just as much as in Britain, at a time when deficit hawks are looking to cut funding in as many areas as possible. We cannot let museums fall under the ax; it would be an incredibly short-sighted mistake, one that we would have cause to regret for a century to come, if not longer.

Comments

  1. Excellent review. I loved the book too.

    ReplyDelete
  2. How about we cut social security. Those danged baby boomers who got us into this mess don't deserve a reward for their failure.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Unanswerable Questions" for Evolution Part One

Creation Ministries International has launched a new initiative, which seems a lot like all the other creationists blitzkriegs before it. With the wonderfully creative tagline of "Question Evolution", CMI intends to challenge "evolutionists" and their "indoctrination" of high school students with the supposed dogma of evolution. They also aim to  cut the population of atheists by half , presumably by challenging the "faith" that every atheist (and only atheists, no "real Christians") is supposed to hold in Darwin's great idea. The main thrust of this is a tract with fifteen "unanswerable" questions for evolutionists. I'm done putting quotation marks around the word, evolutionists; from here on out I ask my readers to recognize that it is a creationist term that is about as silly as calling someone a general relativist (accepts general relativity) or germist (for accepting germ theory). Regardless, CMI seems just as i...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...

The Absurdity/Agony of War

Science writer Mary Roach is never one to shy away from parts of science that verge on the absurd, as anyone who has read any of her books surely knows. I'd read two of her previous books, and been enchanted enough by Roach's unique combination of endless curiosity and a wry sense of humor that I rushed to lay my hands on her newest book. Grunt: The Curious Science of Humans at War will not fail in living up to the expectations that fans of her work will bring. Those who have never read her before will be hard-pressed to put down a book that I finished in a few short days.  The real joy of reading something by Mary Roach is her talent for seeking out strange areas of science that a reader might never have known about. As an investigator, she answers questions you never knew you had. Her newest work   is no exception. We discover, for instance, how the military tests the ability of a fighter jet to survive a mid-air collision with a large bird--by firing a dead chicken...