Skip to main content

Praying for a Win?

Image
By
It's no secret; I hate stupidity, and it doesn't matter whether it comes from the Left or the Right, whether it's religious or secular. I still hate it, and feel free to hold it up for public mockery. So it is with an article in yesterday's Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, noting that a number of religious authorities, including several clergymen, said that it was alright for locals to pray for a Steelers' victory in the Super Bowl. Completely disregarding the fact that they didn't win, am I the only person who finds this kind of talk simply ludicrous?

Even if one believes that there is a God who answers prayer, I fail to see how such a Deity, who must surely be the most busy entity in existence, would care about a single game on one day that in reality is far less important than most people seem to think.

This is a blatant sop by Western Pennsylvania religious figures to a public whose devotion to the Steelers approaches a quasi-religious level. While most may simply be inclined to dismiss this with a little smile, say that, "Well, it's just a game and all in good fun," I see no reason that this talk should be greeted with a wink and a nod. It is yet another example of faulty theology and faulty thinking.
Labels:

Comments

  1. Herla cyningFebruary 7, 2011 at 5:14 AM

    Preach it, brother. ;-)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ronnie PollockFebruary 7, 2011 at 1:07 PM

    I find the notion that God is incredibly 'busy' a little bit silly, as it is based on an anthropomorphism related to the technical functioning of God. However, do you think that praying to be healed from cancer is more or less trivial-sounding to God than asking to win a football game? It's obviously important to us, because we fear death and find it unpleasant, but the same could be said for losing a game. Both are related to our comfort and wishes, while God obviously is above these opinions. To us, one seems appropriate and one seems inappropriate, but from God's vantage point, they are more or less the same. If you believe in prayer, then either none of them are too trivial or all of them are too trivial.

    ReplyDelete
  3. ZenFebruary 7, 2011 at 5:05 PM

    Real gods watch roller derby! ;)

    The level of spiritual narcissism American Christians exhibit is truly astounding.

    "Dear God, please help my favorite team win and bless these snacks we are about to binge on. Amen!"

    ReplyDelete
  4. Brady ClemensFebruary 7, 2011 at 6:36 PM

    Ronnie, anyone can tell the BIG difference between cancer and a football game. If something isn't done in the first, a person may die. If something isn't done in the second, well, no one dies. The latter is trivial, the first a matter of life and death; don't pretend that you don't know the difference. Some requests are just plain petty and selfish. If a person prays for a Jaguar, just because they want one, should we pretend that it is a reasonable and sincere request? If I pray to win the lottery and become rich, is that to be understood on the same level as praying for someone in intensive care?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ronnie PollockFebruary 11, 2011 at 7:23 AM

    A matter of life and death is trivial from God's perspective. Is it not selfish to pray for your own health? It is certainly okay to pray for the little things and the big things, but when we start saying some things are too trivial, we are clearly looking at things through human standards. I never mentioned material goods, because that brings in a whole other spiritual dimension not encountered when you simply pray to win a game.

    ReplyDelete
  6. UnknownFebruary 13, 2011 at 1:53 PM

    Stupid people taste good though! Om Nom Nom Nom!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Unanswerable Questions" for Evolution Part One

By
Creation Ministries International has launched a new initiative, which seems a lot like all the other creationists blitzkriegs before it. With the wonderfully creative tagline of "Question Evolution", CMI intends to challenge "evolutionists" and their "indoctrination" of high school students with the supposed dogma of evolution. They also aim to  cut the population of atheists by half , presumably by challenging the "faith" that every atheist (and only atheists, no "real Christians") is supposed to hold in Darwin's great idea. The main thrust of this is a tract with fifteen "unanswerable" questions for evolutionists. I'm done putting quotation marks around the word, evolutionists; from here on out I ask my readers to recognize that it is a creationist term that is about as silly as calling someone a general relativist (accepts general relativity) or germist (for accepting germ theory). Regardless, CMI seems just as i...
Post a Comment
Read more

What Creationists Don't Understand

By
There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Absurdity/Agony of War

By
Science writer Mary Roach is never one to shy away from parts of science that verge on the absurd, as anyone who has read any of her books surely knows. I'd read two of her previous books, and been enchanted enough by Roach's unique combination of endless curiosity and a wry sense of humor that I rushed to lay my hands on her newest book. Grunt: The Curious Science of Humans at War will not fail in living up to the expectations that fans of her work will bring. Those who have never read her before will be hard-pressed to put down a book that I finished in a few short days.  The real joy of reading something by Mary Roach is her talent for seeking out strange areas of science that a reader might never have known about. As an investigator, she answers questions you never knew you had. Her newest work   is no exception. We discover, for instance, how the military tests the ability of a fighter jet to survive a mid-air collision with a large bird--by firing a dead chicken...
Post a Comment
Read more