Skip to main content

"The Desert Spear"

After several months of anticipation for the paperback (I was too cheap to spring for the hardcover, and I don't own a Kindle, so that wasn't an option), Peter V. Brett's latest in what is being styled "The Demon Cycle" arrived in paperback. I bought The Desert Spear two days after it came out, only because the store in which I purchase most of my books receives its book shipments on Thursdays, and that was when it arrived. I started it that night, and finished it fairly quickly.

The Desert Spear continues the narrative established in the first book, The Warded Man, in which the main character of Arlen Bales progresses in his fight against the demons that plague mankind in Brett's fictional world. We begin with an inside look at the rise of Jardir (ostensibly the human villain of the previous book), in a culture someone akin to the Arabic cultures of our own day, a culture based on battle and honor. The Krasians have a brutal way of life, but that is perhaps to be expected for a people who both live in the desert and actively fight the demons. In preparing to write this review, I read a number of comments on Amazon, and I pause at this moment only long enough to point out that while many were disappointed at Brett's decision to expand so much on the Krasian culture and the background of Jardir, which apparently made them dislike the book or something akin to it, I enjoyed it. It was actually the chunk of the book that I read the quickest. It gave needed depth to the character of Jardir, a reminder that even supposed villains have a past. They aren't Bond villains, evil for the sake of evil. Going forward now, we may not sympathize with Jardir and his Krasians, and the reader may even hope that he dies (I hope so, myself), but at least we have a better understanding of their motives.

Even as humanity begins to fight back against the demons now, thanks to the battle wards discovered by Arlen, then Jardir, a new evil arises in the form of the mind demons, monsters that get inside your head and control your very thoughts and actions. Arlen gets a view of the Core in which he realizes the enemy is far more powerful than they had anticipated, and the demons are pushing back. Victory for humanity is by no means assured.

The story was fast paced, with interesting new developments in plot and character, and numerous moments when I laughed out loud at the humor in it. I'll be looking forward to the third installment, which I believe is going to be called The Daylight War. It can't come soon enough.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Today I Am Ashamed of My Alma Mater

Over a week ago, my alma mater, Clarion University of Pennsylvania, released what it touted as a "bold" and "ambitious" workforce plan for the next several years. The backlash was both strong and immediate, forcing the University Administration, currently headed by President Karen Whitney, to release a " Frequently Asked Questions " for its plan. The outrage on social media, as well as a MoveOn.org petition with several thousand signatures, doubtless have already channeled the displeasure of the community, alumni, and students with the plan. The University is accepting public feedback, but this seems to be only a political window-dressing for a plan that Whitney herself was  quoted  as saying "...is 95-98% a done deal." For over a week I debated over what form a blog on the topic would take, and while I realize that what I have to say here is little different from what I and others have already stated elsewhere, I feel the need to address thi...

How I Left Creationism

There is a discussion going on right now in the science community about whether or not we should debate creationists: it is a debate within a debate, if you will. There are good arguments on both sides, but I have to think that we should debate creationists, and we should do it as often as we can stand it. Why do I think this? Last week, I saw that Michael Shermer posted a link to a story of a woman who argued this very point. As a former creationist, it was going to debates between Shermer and Kent Hovind that began to convince her of the legitimacy of evolution and of science. I too was once a creationist. Without ever having read anything about it, without it ever having been mentioned in class (I never heard a word about evolution in high school), I was ready to pounce at the merest mention of the topic as false and godless, two of the favorite creationist talking-points. I look back at this self in amazement, at how ignorant and proud of that ignorance I was, how I failed to ...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...