Skip to main content

We're Still Here!

And we intend to remain here for quite some time, thank you very much. The world keeps going, much as it has for several billion years, much as it will for millions more, long after I and everyone reading this are dead, long after humanity itself as a species ceases to exist. The world will keep going after that, until the sun expands and consumes it, far into the future. To say anything else (other than a chance collision with an asteroid) is a strange form of wishful thinking, the need to see ourselves, the times in which we live, as special.

In the meantime, religious doomsayers will come and go. And they will all, inevitably, be proven wrong given enough time. How about a listing of such dates? In 1914 the founder of what would come to be the Jehovah's Witnesses predicted the end of the world, and the outbreak of war in Europe seemed to confirm his view. Until the end didn't come, and a religion was organized around the idea that 1914 had marked a transformation in heaven. Early adherents to this new religion went on to predict the end of the world in 1925, 1932 and 1941. And those are just the predictions from the Jehovah's Witnesses. Some believers looked for the end of the world in 1966; upon the founding of Israel in 1948 many saw it as the fulfilling of Biblical prophecy and the start of the end of the world. Still waiting on that one. The famous Hal Lindsey predicted the end of the world in 1981, and the equally famous Pat Robertson (who still retains a large and loyal following) believed the end of the world would come in 1982.

Want more? Hal Lindsey's original 1981 prediction (of something he called a "Secret Rapture", whatever that means) was followed by a prediction of 1988 (the real deal). People looked to the end of the world in 2000 and now in 2011 and 2012. But we don't have to keep going forward, for when we look back in time before the 20th Century we see endless predictions of the end, all of which have failed, every single one. But have we learned anything in the nearly two thousand years of continually predicting the end of the world? Obviously not, for the end-time dates keep coming. Even the people who fell for this most recent scam, the newest date on the long list of failed prophecies, don't seem to have learned much. At least a few former May 21st believers have shrugged it off as a test of their faith and report that it has only been strengthened. They derive the wrong lesson from this whole matter, as most seem to have done. After all, who cares about May 21st when everyone knows that the real end of the world is coming next year!

It is all-too-clear that constantly being fooled and lied to has not prevented most people from continuing gullibility when it comes to apocalyptic fantasies. What we need now isn't more blind faith, it is reason, evidence and critical-thinking skills to prevent this very same phenomenon being repeated over and over again. Why should humanity continue to blunder into the future, blinders firmly attached, when we have the tools to remove those blinders and let them see more clearly? Make no mistake, this fixation on "the end" is not a harmless delusion. Real people are hurt by this. Bank accounts drained, jobs quit, relationships ended. And worse. While some prepare for the end in these relatively minor ways others seek to bring the end through violent means. Lest we forget the Heaven's Gate cult, or the menace of Iran's leaders who hope to bring about the return of the Mahdi through violence, two of many examples that could be used here.

Why can't we focus on the world in which we live, what we have here now and enjoy this place without constantly worrying about a supernatural apocalypse?

This is the time, more now than ever, to be promoting the tools of reason and skeptical thought to a populace that is all-too-easily taken in by the newest huckster, the newest doomsayer, and I ask everyone who celebrates science and reason, everyone who enjoys this life, whether or not you are personally religious, to join in promoting these indispensable tools.

Comments

  1. Would you permit me to say that eschatology is a crock of shit?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Unanswerable Questions" for Evolution Part One

Creation Ministries International has launched a new initiative, which seems a lot like all the other creationists blitzkriegs before it. With the wonderfully creative tagline of "Question Evolution", CMI intends to challenge "evolutionists" and their "indoctrination" of high school students with the supposed dogma of evolution. They also aim to  cut the population of atheists by half , presumably by challenging the "faith" that every atheist (and only atheists, no "real Christians") is supposed to hold in Darwin's great idea. The main thrust of this is a tract with fifteen "unanswerable" questions for evolutionists. I'm done putting quotation marks around the word, evolutionists; from here on out I ask my readers to recognize that it is a creationist term that is about as silly as calling someone a general relativist (accepts general relativity) or germist (for accepting germ theory). Regardless, CMI seems just as i...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...

The Absurdity/Agony of War

Science writer Mary Roach is never one to shy away from parts of science that verge on the absurd, as anyone who has read any of her books surely knows. I'd read two of her previous books, and been enchanted enough by Roach's unique combination of endless curiosity and a wry sense of humor that I rushed to lay my hands on her newest book. Grunt: The Curious Science of Humans at War will not fail in living up to the expectations that fans of her work will bring. Those who have never read her before will be hard-pressed to put down a book that I finished in a few short days.  The real joy of reading something by Mary Roach is her talent for seeking out strange areas of science that a reader might never have known about. As an investigator, she answers questions you never knew you had. Her newest work   is no exception. We discover, for instance, how the military tests the ability of a fighter jet to survive a mid-air collision with a large bird--by firing a dead chicken...