Skip to main content

Apocalypse 2012

I wish I had a dollar for every time someone mentioned the "end of the world" in 2012. It seems like "everyone" knows that the world is supposed to end on December 21, 2012, at the end of the Mayan Calender when asteroids will ravage the earth, Planet X will collide with us or the sun will go mad and burn us to a crisp. Or there will be some sort of giant flood a la Roland Emmerich. Take your pick. Or Jesus will come back, or something like it. These are all false, for various reasons, and as if it isn't enough that I keep hearing this from self-appointed prophets on the History Channel I've now been warned of impending doom from the GOP. Yes, that's right, the GOP. I routinely receive emails from an organization called GOPUSA, dedicated to "bringing the conservative message to America." Turns out that they're just a pack of fear-mongering scoundrels.

Once again, it says, the government is "lying to us," about something that could bring death to millions. Yes, dear readers, "the sun could kill us!" Well of course the sun could kill us, if one stays out in it too long and gets skin cancer. Or sunstroke. Or dehydration. But wait, they don't mean it like that!

The email assures me that numerous factors all point to "something big" in 2012. Why yes, in fact I seem to remember there is a presidential election next year, that's important. But wait, they didn't mean that!

The Mayan Calender "drops off completely." Oh, is that so? The problem is that the Mayan "Long Count" calender that they refer to was just one of several Mayan calenders in use, and the Maya never looked to 2012 as the end of the world. In fact, they calculated dates long into the future past next year, which one would assume means that they didn't expect the world to end. For the Long Count, 2012 represented the point at which the calender started again, like December 31st for our calender. After all, there is nothing on our current 2011 calender past December 31, but we do not expect the world to end then.

"Current events have started sounding an awful lot like Revelation." A personal opinion, not hard fact. While some events that happen now may seem scary, I rather think that people witnessing the end of the Roman Empire, the advance of Genghis Khan or the Black Death of the 14th Century would have had better cause to suspect the end of the world than we do. To say that we live in awful times is myopic at best. We in the West, most of us, have food on our tables, a roof over our heads and go to bed expecting to wake up without fear of being butchered in our beds or dying of virulent disease. Frankly, believers have been seeing Revelation everywhere they looked since Nero allowed Rome to burn! And yet here we are still. How many times to people have to predict a specific date for the end of the world and been proven wrong before this nonsense isn't taken seriously any more. I'm eagerly awaiting May 21st and December 21, 2012 so that I may add those dates to my long list of wrong predictions for the end of the world. Perhaps so-called believers predicting the end of the world should look to their own Bible. You know, that "no man knows the day nor the hour" bit?

The email claims that NASA looks for the sun to go "haywire" next year. Balderdash. Now they're just making stuff up. The current sun cycle does not reach a maximum next year, and in fact this particular cycle has been rather quite and not particularly active.

All this does is attempt to incite fear in the gullible, and it shifts the focus away from our real problems. The Mayan Calender won't mark the end of the world, but it can take people's attention away from the decline of oil. Or global warming, which more than ever is ridiculed as an obvious farce when nothing could be further from the truth. I fear for the good of all when the "end of the world" is widely accepted without evidence but global warming, and evolution for that matter, are rejected in spite of the evidence. It does not bode well for us.

Comments

  1. You should write for a larger public, Brady. This is very, very good. Alas, the gullible fools who fall for the "end of days" crap aren't going to be influenced by you or anyone who can make rational sense. Theirs is a form of mental illness, I swear. Willful ignorance compounded by a total inability to rationally reflect on their ill-supported "opinions." Opinions, by the way, they'll defend until death, even while denying others theirs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Stupid idiots. Everyone knows that 2012 is when we'll have a breakout of the Zombie Virus. Some people never learn.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So should we start hunting for other calendars, predictions, assertions, etc. made by extinct primitive peoples? I smell money!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Today I Am Ashamed of My Alma Mater

Over a week ago, my alma mater, Clarion University of Pennsylvania, released what it touted as a "bold" and "ambitious" workforce plan for the next several years. The backlash was both strong and immediate, forcing the University Administration, currently headed by President Karen Whitney, to release a " Frequently Asked Questions " for its plan. The outrage on social media, as well as a MoveOn.org petition with several thousand signatures, doubtless have already channeled the displeasure of the community, alumni, and students with the plan. The University is accepting public feedback, but this seems to be only a political window-dressing for a plan that Whitney herself was  quoted  as saying "...is 95-98% a done deal." For over a week I debated over what form a blog on the topic would take, and while I realize that what I have to say here is little different from what I and others have already stated elsewhere, I feel the need to address thi...

How I Left Creationism

There is a discussion going on right now in the science community about whether or not we should debate creationists: it is a debate within a debate, if you will. There are good arguments on both sides, but I have to think that we should debate creationists, and we should do it as often as we can stand it. Why do I think this? Last week, I saw that Michael Shermer posted a link to a story of a woman who argued this very point. As a former creationist, it was going to debates between Shermer and Kent Hovind that began to convince her of the legitimacy of evolution and of science. I too was once a creationist. Without ever having read anything about it, without it ever having been mentioned in class (I never heard a word about evolution in high school), I was ready to pounce at the merest mention of the topic as false and godless, two of the favorite creationist talking-points. I look back at this self in amazement, at how ignorant and proud of that ignorance I was, how I failed to ...

The Hovinds...Still Poking at Straw Men

Kent Hovind, the false "Dr. Dino", and his ilk are at it again. In a new article on his website, Hovind (or whoever authored the piece, perhaps his son) claims that while creationists have no problems using miracles to explain events (a habit that perpetually makes them unfit to do real science), evolutionists criticize them for it, even though, in Hovind's mind, they rely on miracles just as much to explain their "religion" of descent through natural selection. This is, at its core, demonstrably nonsense. He claims that a "miracle" is needed to make stars and planets form out of gas, a supposed violation of Boyle's Law because there was no "outside force" acting on the gas and dust. How about gravity, Dr. Dino? That would certainly explain it, no miracles needed here. This attack is a non-sequitur. The objection has everything to do with astronomy and cosmology and nothing to do with evolution, which is the development of new species o...