Skip to main content

Apocalypse 2012

I wish I had a dollar for every time someone mentioned the "end of the world" in 2012. It seems like "everyone" knows that the world is supposed to end on December 21, 2012, at the end of the Mayan Calender when asteroids will ravage the earth, Planet X will collide with us or the sun will go mad and burn us to a crisp. Or there will be some sort of giant flood a la Roland Emmerich. Take your pick. Or Jesus will come back, or something like it. These are all false, for various reasons, and as if it isn't enough that I keep hearing this from self-appointed prophets on the History Channel I've now been warned of impending doom from the GOP. Yes, that's right, the GOP. I routinely receive emails from an organization called GOPUSA, dedicated to "bringing the conservative message to America." Turns out that they're just a pack of fear-mongering scoundrels.

Once again, it says, the government is "lying to us," about something that could bring death to millions. Yes, dear readers, "the sun could kill us!" Well of course the sun could kill us, if one stays out in it too long and gets skin cancer. Or sunstroke. Or dehydration. But wait, they don't mean it like that!

The email assures me that numerous factors all point to "something big" in 2012. Why yes, in fact I seem to remember there is a presidential election next year, that's important. But wait, they didn't mean that!

The Mayan Calender "drops off completely." Oh, is that so? The problem is that the Mayan "Long Count" calender that they refer to was just one of several Mayan calenders in use, and the Maya never looked to 2012 as the end of the world. In fact, they calculated dates long into the future past next year, which one would assume means that they didn't expect the world to end. For the Long Count, 2012 represented the point at which the calender started again, like December 31st for our calender. After all, there is nothing on our current 2011 calender past December 31, but we do not expect the world to end then.

"Current events have started sounding an awful lot like Revelation." A personal opinion, not hard fact. While some events that happen now may seem scary, I rather think that people witnessing the end of the Roman Empire, the advance of Genghis Khan or the Black Death of the 14th Century would have had better cause to suspect the end of the world than we do. To say that we live in awful times is myopic at best. We in the West, most of us, have food on our tables, a roof over our heads and go to bed expecting to wake up without fear of being butchered in our beds or dying of virulent disease. Frankly, believers have been seeing Revelation everywhere they looked since Nero allowed Rome to burn! And yet here we are still. How many times to people have to predict a specific date for the end of the world and been proven wrong before this nonsense isn't taken seriously any more. I'm eagerly awaiting May 21st and December 21, 2012 so that I may add those dates to my long list of wrong predictions for the end of the world. Perhaps so-called believers predicting the end of the world should look to their own Bible. You know, that "no man knows the day nor the hour" bit?

The email claims that NASA looks for the sun to go "haywire" next year. Balderdash. Now they're just making stuff up. The current sun cycle does not reach a maximum next year, and in fact this particular cycle has been rather quite and not particularly active.

All this does is attempt to incite fear in the gullible, and it shifts the focus away from our real problems. The Mayan Calender won't mark the end of the world, but it can take people's attention away from the decline of oil. Or global warming, which more than ever is ridiculed as an obvious farce when nothing could be further from the truth. I fear for the good of all when the "end of the world" is widely accepted without evidence but global warming, and evolution for that matter, are rejected in spite of the evidence. It does not bode well for us.

Comments

  1. You should write for a larger public, Brady. This is very, very good. Alas, the gullible fools who fall for the "end of days" crap aren't going to be influenced by you or anyone who can make rational sense. Theirs is a form of mental illness, I swear. Willful ignorance compounded by a total inability to rationally reflect on their ill-supported "opinions." Opinions, by the way, they'll defend until death, even while denying others theirs.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Stupid idiots. Everyone knows that 2012 is when we'll have a breakout of the Zombie Virus. Some people never learn.

    ReplyDelete
  3. So should we start hunting for other calendars, predictions, assertions, etc. made by extinct primitive peoples? I smell money!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

"Unanswerable Questions" for Evolution Part One

Creation Ministries International has launched a new initiative, which seems a lot like all the other creationists blitzkriegs before it. With the wonderfully creative tagline of "Question Evolution", CMI intends to challenge "evolutionists" and their "indoctrination" of high school students with the supposed dogma of evolution. They also aim to  cut the population of atheists by half , presumably by challenging the "faith" that every atheist (and only atheists, no "real Christians") is supposed to hold in Darwin's great idea. The main thrust of this is a tract with fifteen "unanswerable" questions for evolutionists. I'm done putting quotation marks around the word, evolutionists; from here on out I ask my readers to recognize that it is a creationist term that is about as silly as calling someone a general relativist (accepts general relativity) or germist (for accepting germ theory). Regardless, CMI seems just as i...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...

The Absurdity/Agony of War

Science writer Mary Roach is never one to shy away from parts of science that verge on the absurd, as anyone who has read any of her books surely knows. I'd read two of her previous books, and been enchanted enough by Roach's unique combination of endless curiosity and a wry sense of humor that I rushed to lay my hands on her newest book. Grunt: The Curious Science of Humans at War will not fail in living up to the expectations that fans of her work will bring. Those who have never read her before will be hard-pressed to put down a book that I finished in a few short days.  The real joy of reading something by Mary Roach is her talent for seeking out strange areas of science that a reader might never have known about. As an investigator, she answers questions you never knew you had. Her newest work   is no exception. We discover, for instance, how the military tests the ability of a fighter jet to survive a mid-air collision with a large bird--by firing a dead chicken...