Skip to main content

Stranger Than We Can Imagine

The universe is a strange and wondrous place; children seem to know this instinctively, as we always note a "child-like sense of wonder." But this sense of wonder need not be limited to children--everyone should experience this sense of wonder, at so many points in their lives. If one can pass through this life and never experience this sense of wonder at some of the marvelous things in the world, then I truly feel sorry for them. Sometimes science is accused of "unweaving the rainbow," to quote John Keats, but even the most basic understanding of science shouldn't destroy one's sense of wonder, it should heighten it! Science has solved a number of the mysteries of the world, and is hard at work explaining the currently unexplained. The Earth is not, in fact, at the center of the solar system, nor is the Earth the center of the universe, the entire cosmos formed for the sole purpose of entertaining humanity. Our species was not the result of a special creation, the world given to us alone--we've been dethroned from the pedestal that we thought we occupied. Even studies of our ape relatives are revealing that many of the characteristics we thought belonged to us alone belong to apes as well. The universe seems a cold and impersonal place, indifferent to the fate of humanity.

But if this is the picture you take away with you from science, then you are missing the point. The universe was not designed for us, to be sure, and to think that this is so is to be guilty of the highest form of unforgivable hubris. Yet the universe is an astounding thing; in words attributed to Sir Arthur Eddington, not only is the universe stranger than we imagine, it is stranger than we can imagine. If you doubt that, you've never looked at images from the Hubble Telescope, nor have you read anything about quantum mechanics (I still don't understand it, but what I do understand is astounding). This need not be limited to the present, by no means. Geology and paleontology have shed light on the distant past, unveiling an amazing story much greater than any Flood myth (whichever one you might fancy). A world before humans saw creatures ranging from the trilobite to the tyrannosaur to brontotheres, gigantic insects and great sail-backed reptiles--all long before even the first hominid stepped down out of a tree! The great engines of plate tectonics brought the continents together and broke them apart again, and neither evolution nor plate tectonics have stopped their ceaseless work. Watching this process unfold is awe-inspiring:


 
To think that people can say science is boring blows my mind. Tell me that you aren't amazed by the fact that some of the same information still in our DNA was in the first organisms that crawled out of the sea onto the land; tell me that you aren't amazed that the matter that makes up our bodies was formed when stars in the early universe died, sending out the elements that compose our physical bodies. Tell me you aren't amazed that the work of science has stamped out smallpox across the world, a disease that was once the scourge of humanity; tell me you aren't amazed that we are very close to doing the same to polio! Science has revealed not a universe that has been impoverished by its separation from the old myths of the Norse and the Greeks, one diminished because we are not its sole purpose. Instead, the world we live in and the universe that we inhabit is one that has been magnified by science, found to be more wonderful than we could possibly imagine, and one of the true joys of this existence is learning about the world we live in and watching science uncover still more of it, as we dig deeper into our past and simultaneously set out to the stars. 
 


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Today I Am Ashamed of My Alma Mater

Over a week ago, my alma mater, Clarion University of Pennsylvania, released what it touted as a "bold" and "ambitious" workforce plan for the next several years. The backlash was both strong and immediate, forcing the University Administration, currently headed by President Karen Whitney, to release a " Frequently Asked Questions " for its plan. The outrage on social media, as well as a MoveOn.org petition with several thousand signatures, doubtless have already channeled the displeasure of the community, alumni, and students with the plan. The University is accepting public feedback, but this seems to be only a political window-dressing for a plan that Whitney herself was  quoted  as saying "...is 95-98% a done deal." For over a week I debated over what form a blog on the topic would take, and while I realize that what I have to say here is little different from what I and others have already stated elsewhere, I feel the need to address thi...

How I Left Creationism

There is a discussion going on right now in the science community about whether or not we should debate creationists: it is a debate within a debate, if you will. There are good arguments on both sides, but I have to think that we should debate creationists, and we should do it as often as we can stand it. Why do I think this? Last week, I saw that Michael Shermer posted a link to a story of a woman who argued this very point. As a former creationist, it was going to debates between Shermer and Kent Hovind that began to convince her of the legitimacy of evolution and of science. I too was once a creationist. Without ever having read anything about it, without it ever having been mentioned in class (I never heard a word about evolution in high school), I was ready to pounce at the merest mention of the topic as false and godless, two of the favorite creationist talking-points. I look back at this self in amazement, at how ignorant and proud of that ignorance I was, how I failed to ...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...