Skip to main content

The Exodus of Bigots Begins

For anyone who has watched the contentious debate within the Boy Scouts as to whether or not the organization should refrain from forcing out gay scouts, seeing a bigot backlash is not exactly surprising. After all, there were numerous threats from some that they would leave the Scouts rather than serve alongside gays. And now, we can see the first stirrings as some move toward the exit. One father has already detailed his plans to withdraw his son from the Scouts. Shamelessly, he blames the Scouts, rather than his own intolerance and prejudice, for his son's subsequent tears.

Perhaps even less surprising is the move by Southern Baptists to cut ties entirely to the organization, so outraged are they by the Scouts' belated, half-hearted decision to be tolerant of those who are different from them. The Baptists are having none of this, moving to vote on a resolution to urge member congregations to sever ties, a resolution that members emphasize is non-binding but may well prove to be the push some Southern Baptist churches need to say goodbye to the Boy Scouts. One member, Pastor Tim Reed, proclaimed that "God's Word says explicitly that homosexuality is a choice, a sin," in spite of the fact that Jesus himself said nothing about homosexuals in any of the Gospels and that the Old Testament prohibition against homosexuality is part of a long list of prohibitions that Christians routinely ignore, including directives against cutting one's beard and tattoos

Before this is over, a number of Scouts will leave, and a number of churches and other organizations will sever ties. But the Boy Scouts will survive and in fact thrive without these intolerant individuals participating, and they can take comfort in the fact that not every religious organization is opposed to the change in policy. The United Church of Christ, the Unitarian Universalist Association, the Episcopal Church, the National Jewish Committee on Scouting, and, most remarkably of all, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints, have all endorsed allowing gay scouts to serve openly. And this is a welcome development.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Today I Am Ashamed of My Alma Mater

Over a week ago, my alma mater, Clarion University of Pennsylvania, released what it touted as a "bold" and "ambitious" workforce plan for the next several years. The backlash was both strong and immediate, forcing the University Administration, currently headed by President Karen Whitney, to release a " Frequently Asked Questions " for its plan. The outrage on social media, as well as a MoveOn.org petition with several thousand signatures, doubtless have already channeled the displeasure of the community, alumni, and students with the plan. The University is accepting public feedback, but this seems to be only a political window-dressing for a plan that Whitney herself was  quoted  as saying "...is 95-98% a done deal." For over a week I debated over what form a blog on the topic would take, and while I realize that what I have to say here is little different from what I and others have already stated elsewhere, I feel the need to address thi...

How I Left Creationism

There is a discussion going on right now in the science community about whether or not we should debate creationists: it is a debate within a debate, if you will. There are good arguments on both sides, but I have to think that we should debate creationists, and we should do it as often as we can stand it. Why do I think this? Last week, I saw that Michael Shermer posted a link to a story of a woman who argued this very point. As a former creationist, it was going to debates between Shermer and Kent Hovind that began to convince her of the legitimacy of evolution and of science. I too was once a creationist. Without ever having read anything about it, without it ever having been mentioned in class (I never heard a word about evolution in high school), I was ready to pounce at the merest mention of the topic as false and godless, two of the favorite creationist talking-points. I look back at this self in amazement, at how ignorant and proud of that ignorance I was, how I failed to ...

The Hovinds...Still Poking at Straw Men

Kent Hovind, the false "Dr. Dino", and his ilk are at it again. In a new article on his website, Hovind (or whoever authored the piece, perhaps his son) claims that while creationists have no problems using miracles to explain events (a habit that perpetually makes them unfit to do real science), evolutionists criticize them for it, even though, in Hovind's mind, they rely on miracles just as much to explain their "religion" of descent through natural selection. This is, at its core, demonstrably nonsense. He claims that a "miracle" is needed to make stars and planets form out of gas, a supposed violation of Boyle's Law because there was no "outside force" acting on the gas and dust. How about gravity, Dr. Dino? That would certainly explain it, no miracles needed here. This attack is a non-sequitur. The objection has everything to do with astronomy and cosmology and nothing to do with evolution, which is the development of new species o...