Skip to main content

Book Review: Boy Meets Boy

I tend not to read as much fiction as I used to. Anymore it seems that one or other nonfiction works seem to capture my attention at any given time. This is not to say that I never read fiction; I read a lot of fantasy novels, and I also read a lot of works that are grouped into the category of Young Adult fiction. As a librarian working with the public, it is useful to be familiar with a range of what exists in both Young Adult and Junior Fiction, but the joy of this literature goes well beyond its utility. Some of the most interesting and innovative stories are being published by young adult authors, ranging from Scott Westerfeld's Leviathan to John Green's The Fault in Our Stars

Previously I had read only one book by David Levithan, his collaboration with John Green, Will Grayson, Will Grayson, featuring the intertwined stories of two young gay men. That book was interesting enough that I wanted to read more by Levithan (I went on and read everything by John Green in the meantime). When I was shelving some books in the Young Adult section at work, I came across a few books by Levithan and selected Boy Meets Boy out of those available. The read was short, delightful, and at times profoundly moving. 

Boy Meets Boy would be a typical book about the joys and sorrows of high school love, a storyline so well-trod as to be boring at this point. Levithan takes this and portrays it from a perspective that is too infrequently taken (though that is changing), that of a young gay high school student, experiencing the very same tortuous and winding path that high school romance takes for so many. It is a powerful rejoinder against hateful bigots who see gays and lesbians as somehow Other, alien, an enemy. The emotions the narrator, Paul, feels are no different from what anyone feels growing up, the unique feeling of joy and pain all intermingled that love can bring, the fear of rejection, the confusion that can cloud our feelings. The fact that the feelings are for another boy seems almost secondary. Were it not for the fact that a sizable number of people still stand opposed to full equality for gays, the fact that the romance is between two boys would hardly even be noteworthy.

But it is, and Levithan, along with other authors who defy bigotry and possible censorship to tell stories like this one, is doing a great service to all society in having written this book, in portraying the love between two gay high schoolers as no different, no less meaningful or worthy of respect, than the love between two heterosexual high school students. I found the book to be captivating. While the idea of a gay protagonist living in such a tolerant place as Paul does made me skeptical, facing a remarkably small amount of bigotry, I can ignore my misgivings about how realistic such a place would be because of the story itself. The book isn't about that, it is about love. Short, at less than two hundred pages, the novel deals realistically with the problems of dealing with new love, broken trust, with friends who are changing as life itself changes. If you're looking for a nice weekend read, give Levithan's work a try. You aren't likely to regret the choice.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Unanswerable Questions" for Evolution Part One

Creation Ministries International has launched a new initiative, which seems a lot like all the other creationists blitzkriegs before it. With the wonderfully creative tagline of "Question Evolution", CMI intends to challenge "evolutionists" and their "indoctrination" of high school students with the supposed dogma of evolution. They also aim to  cut the population of atheists by half , presumably by challenging the "faith" that every atheist (and only atheists, no "real Christians") is supposed to hold in Darwin's great idea. The main thrust of this is a tract with fifteen "unanswerable" questions for evolutionists. I'm done putting quotation marks around the word, evolutionists; from here on out I ask my readers to recognize that it is a creationist term that is about as silly as calling someone a general relativist (accepts general relativity) or germist (for accepting germ theory). Regardless, CMI seems just as i...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...

The Absurdity/Agony of War

Science writer Mary Roach is never one to shy away from parts of science that verge on the absurd, as anyone who has read any of her books surely knows. I'd read two of her previous books, and been enchanted enough by Roach's unique combination of endless curiosity and a wry sense of humor that I rushed to lay my hands on her newest book. Grunt: The Curious Science of Humans at War will not fail in living up to the expectations that fans of her work will bring. Those who have never read her before will be hard-pressed to put down a book that I finished in a few short days.  The real joy of reading something by Mary Roach is her talent for seeking out strange areas of science that a reader might never have known about. As an investigator, she answers questions you never knew you had. Her newest work   is no exception. We discover, for instance, how the military tests the ability of a fighter jet to survive a mid-air collision with a large bird--by firing a dead chicken...