Skip to main content

Book Review: Boy Meets Boy

I tend not to read as much fiction as I used to. Anymore it seems that one or other nonfiction works seem to capture my attention at any given time. This is not to say that I never read fiction; I read a lot of fantasy novels, and I also read a lot of works that are grouped into the category of Young Adult fiction. As a librarian working with the public, it is useful to be familiar with a range of what exists in both Young Adult and Junior Fiction, but the joy of this literature goes well beyond its utility. Some of the most interesting and innovative stories are being published by young adult authors, ranging from Scott Westerfeld's Leviathan to John Green's The Fault in Our Stars

Previously I had read only one book by David Levithan, his collaboration with John Green, Will Grayson, Will Grayson, featuring the intertwined stories of two young gay men. That book was interesting enough that I wanted to read more by Levithan (I went on and read everything by John Green in the meantime). When I was shelving some books in the Young Adult section at work, I came across a few books by Levithan and selected Boy Meets Boy out of those available. The read was short, delightful, and at times profoundly moving. 

Boy Meets Boy would be a typical book about the joys and sorrows of high school love, a storyline so well-trod as to be boring at this point. Levithan takes this and portrays it from a perspective that is too infrequently taken (though that is changing), that of a young gay high school student, experiencing the very same tortuous and winding path that high school romance takes for so many. It is a powerful rejoinder against hateful bigots who see gays and lesbians as somehow Other, alien, an enemy. The emotions the narrator, Paul, feels are no different from what anyone feels growing up, the unique feeling of joy and pain all intermingled that love can bring, the fear of rejection, the confusion that can cloud our feelings. The fact that the feelings are for another boy seems almost secondary. Were it not for the fact that a sizable number of people still stand opposed to full equality for gays, the fact that the romance is between two boys would hardly even be noteworthy.

But it is, and Levithan, along with other authors who defy bigotry and possible censorship to tell stories like this one, is doing a great service to all society in having written this book, in portraying the love between two gay high schoolers as no different, no less meaningful or worthy of respect, than the love between two heterosexual high school students. I found the book to be captivating. While the idea of a gay protagonist living in such a tolerant place as Paul does made me skeptical, facing a remarkably small amount of bigotry, I can ignore my misgivings about how realistic such a place would be because of the story itself. The book isn't about that, it is about love. Short, at less than two hundred pages, the novel deals realistically with the problems of dealing with new love, broken trust, with friends who are changing as life itself changes. If you're looking for a nice weekend read, give Levithan's work a try. You aren't likely to regret the choice.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Today I Am Ashamed of My Alma Mater

Over a week ago, my alma mater, Clarion University of Pennsylvania, released what it touted as a "bold" and "ambitious" workforce plan for the next several years. The backlash was both strong and immediate, forcing the University Administration, currently headed by President Karen Whitney, to release a " Frequently Asked Questions " for its plan. The outrage on social media, as well as a MoveOn.org petition with several thousand signatures, doubtless have already channeled the displeasure of the community, alumni, and students with the plan. The University is accepting public feedback, but this seems to be only a political window-dressing for a plan that Whitney herself was  quoted  as saying "...is 95-98% a done deal." For over a week I debated over what form a blog on the topic would take, and while I realize that what I have to say here is little different from what I and others have already stated elsewhere, I feel the need to address thi...

How I Left Creationism

There is a discussion going on right now in the science community about whether or not we should debate creationists: it is a debate within a debate, if you will. There are good arguments on both sides, but I have to think that we should debate creationists, and we should do it as often as we can stand it. Why do I think this? Last week, I saw that Michael Shermer posted a link to a story of a woman who argued this very point. As a former creationist, it was going to debates between Shermer and Kent Hovind that began to convince her of the legitimacy of evolution and of science. I too was once a creationist. Without ever having read anything about it, without it ever having been mentioned in class (I never heard a word about evolution in high school), I was ready to pounce at the merest mention of the topic as false and godless, two of the favorite creationist talking-points. I look back at this self in amazement, at how ignorant and proud of that ignorance I was, how I failed to ...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...