Skip to main content

Texas Is About to Embarrass Us Again

In the never-ending Whack-a-Mole of creationist attacks on education, it had apparently quieted down for a little. I hadn't been hearing much about creationist holy warriors, beyond the usual background noise of discontent from the likes of Answers in Genesis. Yet to think that they could be safely ignored would be a mistake, as they've now reared their ugly head in Texas, looking to grab a huge victory for their movement, and thus ensure yet another disaster for an educational system that has already been heavily battered and wounded. 

The Texas State Board of Education is currently in the process of adopting new textbooks in line with the education standards that they pushed in 2009, standards designed specifically to allow creationism into the science classroom. Sensing this opportunity, creationist members of the Board are pushing for pro-creationist textbooks, or at the very least ones that are extraordinarily weak in presenting evolution, the central unifying theory of biology. Should they succeed in this push, it isn't just students in Texas who will suffer a poorer quality education for it. As a major market for textbooks, with about four million students, textbook companies will tailor works for Texas that would likely be adopted by schools far beyond that state. The thought that Texas students would be harmed by this ideological push to drive sound, verified science from the classroom is bad enough, but knowing that students across the country would have pseudoscientific rubbish pushed on them as well is especially abominable. 

We've seen this story before, the tune remarkably familiar. When any opening is found, creationist drones descend to push for "balance" in teaching science, for presenting "both sides of the argument," and further arguing that their religious freedom is at stake. All of this is absolute and total nonsense. Should we balance the teaching of the Copernican theory of the solar system with the notion that the Sun actually revolves around the earth? Should we evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the idea that gravity exists? No sane person would argue that this is the case, but when it comes to the settled science of evolution, as sure a fact as gravity or a heliocentric solar system, a range of useful idiots and charlatans are happy to try and sabotage the education of our students. The creationists deride evolution as a humanistic "theory," without the first inclination of what that word means in science, refusing to accept that it is settled scientific fact that life evolved into the manifold forms we see around us today. 

The creationists are welcome to teach whatever they want in their churches or in the privacy of their homes, but they are deeply wrong in trying to undermine the education that everyone else receives. If Texas goes through with this textbook deception the damage will echo across the country, even beyond the classrooms of our nation's schools to embolden and energize a creationist movement that has suffered numerous losses in the last few decades. Please, Texas, don't embarrass this country yet again.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Unanswerable Questions" for Evolution Part One

Creation Ministries International has launched a new initiative, which seems a lot like all the other creationists blitzkriegs before it. With the wonderfully creative tagline of "Question Evolution", CMI intends to challenge "evolutionists" and their "indoctrination" of high school students with the supposed dogma of evolution. They also aim to  cut the population of atheists by half , presumably by challenging the "faith" that every atheist (and only atheists, no "real Christians") is supposed to hold in Darwin's great idea. The main thrust of this is a tract with fifteen "unanswerable" questions for evolutionists. I'm done putting quotation marks around the word, evolutionists; from here on out I ask my readers to recognize that it is a creationist term that is about as silly as calling someone a general relativist (accepts general relativity) or germist (for accepting germ theory). Regardless, CMI seems just as i...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...

The Absurdity/Agony of War

Science writer Mary Roach is never one to shy away from parts of science that verge on the absurd, as anyone who has read any of her books surely knows. I'd read two of her previous books, and been enchanted enough by Roach's unique combination of endless curiosity and a wry sense of humor that I rushed to lay my hands on her newest book. Grunt: The Curious Science of Humans at War will not fail in living up to the expectations that fans of her work will bring. Those who have never read her before will be hard-pressed to put down a book that I finished in a few short days.  The real joy of reading something by Mary Roach is her talent for seeking out strange areas of science that a reader might never have known about. As an investigator, she answers questions you never knew you had. Her newest work   is no exception. We discover, for instance, how the military tests the ability of a fighter jet to survive a mid-air collision with a large bird--by firing a dead chicken...