Skip to main content

Texas Is About to Embarrass Us Again

Image
By
In the never-ending Whack-a-Mole of creationist attacks on education, it had apparently quieted down for a little. I hadn't been hearing much about creationist holy warriors, beyond the usual background noise of discontent from the likes of Answers in Genesis. Yet to think that they could be safely ignored would be a mistake, as they've now reared their ugly head in Texas, looking to grab a huge victory for their movement, and thus ensure yet another disaster for an educational system that has already been heavily battered and wounded. 

The Texas State Board of Education is currently in the process of adopting new textbooks in line with the education standards that they pushed in 2009, standards designed specifically to allow creationism into the science classroom. Sensing this opportunity, creationist members of the Board are pushing for pro-creationist textbooks, or at the very least ones that are extraordinarily weak in presenting evolution, the central unifying theory of biology. Should they succeed in this push, it isn't just students in Texas who will suffer a poorer quality education for it. As a major market for textbooks, with about four million students, textbook companies will tailor works for Texas that would likely be adopted by schools far beyond that state. The thought that Texas students would be harmed by this ideological push to drive sound, verified science from the classroom is bad enough, but knowing that students across the country would have pseudoscientific rubbish pushed on them as well is especially abominable. 

We've seen this story before, the tune remarkably familiar. When any opening is found, creationist drones descend to push for "balance" in teaching science, for presenting "both sides of the argument," and further arguing that their religious freedom is at stake. All of this is absolute and total nonsense. Should we balance the teaching of the Copernican theory of the solar system with the notion that the Sun actually revolves around the earth? Should we evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the idea that gravity exists? No sane person would argue that this is the case, but when it comes to the settled science of evolution, as sure a fact as gravity or a heliocentric solar system, a range of useful idiots and charlatans are happy to try and sabotage the education of our students. The creationists deride evolution as a humanistic "theory," without the first inclination of what that word means in science, refusing to accept that it is settled scientific fact that life evolved into the manifold forms we see around us today. 

The creationists are welcome to teach whatever they want in their churches or in the privacy of their homes, but they are deeply wrong in trying to undermine the education that everyone else receives. If Texas goes through with this textbook deception the damage will echo across the country, even beyond the classrooms of our nation's schools to embolden and energize a creationist movement that has suffered numerous losses in the last few decades. Please, Texas, don't embarrass this country yet again.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Today I Am Ashamed of My Alma Mater

By
Over a week ago, my alma mater, Clarion University of Pennsylvania, released what it touted as a "bold" and "ambitious" workforce plan for the next several years. The backlash was both strong and immediate, forcing the University Administration, currently headed by President Karen Whitney, to release a " Frequently Asked Questions " for its plan. The outrage on social media, as well as a MoveOn.org petition with several thousand signatures, doubtless have already channeled the displeasure of the community, alumni, and students with the plan. The University is accepting public feedback, but this seems to be only a political window-dressing for a plan that Whitney herself was  quoted  as saying "...is 95-98% a done deal." For over a week I debated over what form a blog on the topic would take, and while I realize that what I have to say here is little different from what I and others have already stated elsewhere, I feel the need to address thi...
18 comments
Read more

How I Left Creationism

By
There is a discussion going on right now in the science community about whether or not we should debate creationists: it is a debate within a debate, if you will. There are good arguments on both sides, but I have to think that we should debate creationists, and we should do it as often as we can stand it. Why do I think this? Last week, I saw that Michael Shermer posted a link to a story of a woman who argued this very point. As a former creationist, it was going to debates between Shermer and Kent Hovind that began to convince her of the legitimacy of evolution and of science. I too was once a creationist. Without ever having read anything about it, without it ever having been mentioned in class (I never heard a word about evolution in high school), I was ready to pounce at the merest mention of the topic as false and godless, two of the favorite creationist talking-points. I look back at this self in amazement, at how ignorant and proud of that ignorance I was, how I failed to ...
23 comments
Read more

What Creationists Don't Understand

By
There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...
Post a Comment
Read more