Skip to main content

The Beauty of Crows

There is beauty in desolation. There is, for me, a beauty in leafless trees, in cold, wind-swept landscapes, in the gathering of crows calling out into the evening air. Some people dislike the barrenness that comes at the ending of fall, but I take joy in the transition, in seeing the leaves blown across fields, the bare limbs reaching up into the sky like beseeching hands. It is a feeling that is hard to explain. While others see ugliness, the death of summer and decay, I see transition, the fuel for future life being laid down right before our eyes, if only we care to look.

We don't like the idea of time slipping away from us; we detest the sight of death and vigorously avoid dealing with the fact that we will all have to face it at one point. Yet continued life depends on the very death and decay we so avoid. This is an inevitable fact of our biosphere, of our cosmos in fact. The nutrients that are taken up in the trees come back to earth when the leaves fall; the tall grasses of summer die back along with the flowers, and thus the nutrients taken out of the earth return to it again. It is a process that can take a variety of forms, from the mundane to the fascinating. I remember an old tree fallen in the woods near our house when I was much younger, the edge sticking out just beyond the line of trees. My brothers and I would stand on the trunk and run back and forth, dodging mushrooms and errant patches of green moss. Over the course of a few years, shelf mushrooms broke down one end of it, the mycelium quietly infiltrating the log, until one day we found the entire end had fallen into pieces. It was absolutely fascinating, and it still is.

Crows to me are beautiful; I was delighted yesterday that a whole murder of crows was sitting on a tree near the library and calling out across the parking lot. These birds too have fascinated me for a long time, and they perform a useful function in the ecosystem as well by helping to make carrion disappear from our landscape. This is an essential part of life on earth. Without it, without a mechanism that allows nutrients to be recycled back into the system, life would not be able to exist for terribly long. We are all products of this. 

On a far grander scale, our existence depends on the death of stars. In the early universe, massive stars died, and when they did the heavy elements that were created in the great internal furnaces that powered them were released into the universe. Without that, none of us would be here. This is, for me, one of the most meaningful conclusions of science thus far, that the molecules that make up our body were once part of enormous stars. That when we pass on, our bodies will be broken down and the molecules that we are made of will continue on, even though we will not. It is as close as we will come to realizing our fantasies of immortality.

These things, the decomposers and thoughts of early stars, remind me too that life isn't a destination, that instead everything is in a continual state of transition. It never really ends--at least not for several billion years more. For some, this thought may seem frightening, but for me this thought is liberating, a fact of stunning beauty. When everything is a transition, it takes away some of the fear inherent in transition and lets us enjoy life just a little bit more. And that is enough for me.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Today I Am Ashamed of My Alma Mater

Over a week ago, my alma mater, Clarion University of Pennsylvania, released what it touted as a "bold" and "ambitious" workforce plan for the next several years. The backlash was both strong and immediate, forcing the University Administration, currently headed by President Karen Whitney, to release a " Frequently Asked Questions " for its plan. The outrage on social media, as well as a MoveOn.org petition with several thousand signatures, doubtless have already channeled the displeasure of the community, alumni, and students with the plan. The University is accepting public feedback, but this seems to be only a political window-dressing for a plan that Whitney herself was  quoted  as saying "...is 95-98% a done deal." For over a week I debated over what form a blog on the topic would take, and while I realize that what I have to say here is little different from what I and others have already stated elsewhere, I feel the need to address thi...

How I Left Creationism

There is a discussion going on right now in the science community about whether or not we should debate creationists: it is a debate within a debate, if you will. There are good arguments on both sides, but I have to think that we should debate creationists, and we should do it as often as we can stand it. Why do I think this? Last week, I saw that Michael Shermer posted a link to a story of a woman who argued this very point. As a former creationist, it was going to debates between Shermer and Kent Hovind that began to convince her of the legitimacy of evolution and of science. I too was once a creationist. Without ever having read anything about it, without it ever having been mentioned in class (I never heard a word about evolution in high school), I was ready to pounce at the merest mention of the topic as false and godless, two of the favorite creationist talking-points. I look back at this self in amazement, at how ignorant and proud of that ignorance I was, how I failed to ...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...