Skip to main content

Fighting the Muse

Some days you sit down to write, and nothing comes. I think that this must happen to every writer at some point or other, even prolific ones like R.A. Salvatore and Ray Bradbury. They too must have looked at a blank page and sighed at the lack of words on it, going to the well of inspiration only to find that it is dry. I wonder how they wiled away the time, what they did to distract themselves from the fact that the muse is being stingy with her gifts of an exciting plot and the right words to bring it to life? Did Bradbury play with his toys (he famously enjoyed getting toys as gifts throughout his life)? Did Hemingway have another drink? Did Tolkien work at translating some Old English text? I wonder what Debbie Macomber or Nora Roberts do when they have writer's block. They may write several books a year, but it must happen to them too, every once in a while.

Just like every writer has to deal with writer's block, surely every writer has their own way of coping with it as well. We make tea, read a book, distract ourselves by watching the latest episode of The Colbert Report. We look at Tumblr and Facebook; we write blog posts about how awful the whole thing is, looking at a blank page when the words fail. But no matter how we may postpone the inevitable, the story is still waiting for us whenever we force ourselves to return. Some days when the words won't come easily, I manage to eke out a single page, or just a paragraph. Even a few sentences is better than nothing at all. On days like that, every word is a victory against the empty page, when you start to wonder whether it's worth it to keep fighting, writing a story when you could be reading someone else's.

Of course, not everything you write on a blocked day is going to be good. The next day, you might revisit what you wrote and not even recognize yourself in it. On other days, what you struggled to write seems not so very bad at all, and this is heartening. Don't worry about whether it seems good or bad. If it is bad, you can fix it. It can be re-written, edited and shaped into something worth reading. You can't fix what you didn't write in the first place. So write. Some days the muse is kind, and a few pages come out in the course of an hour or so. Those are the good days; they are rare enough, so I try and enjoy them when they happen. Other days you spend fighting the muse even for just a few lines. I like to think that those are the days that help make you better, because you keep writing even when it would be easier to quit and do something else. And it is worth it. What you write is your accomplishment. No matter what else someone may think about it, whether they love it or despise it, you created something, and that matters. When you write, when you tell a story, you are engaging in a tradition as old as the human species itself, going back from the present, with its massive publishing industry, to the oral tradition of memory, beyond that to the earliest cave drawings where, no doubt, those men and women were telling stories too. So if you want to write, write through the block, even though it's hard, even if the story is only for you, or a few close friends. Write until the words start to flow again. It still matters.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Today I Am Ashamed of My Alma Mater

Over a week ago, my alma mater, Clarion University of Pennsylvania, released what it touted as a "bold" and "ambitious" workforce plan for the next several years. The backlash was both strong and immediate, forcing the University Administration, currently headed by President Karen Whitney, to release a " Frequently Asked Questions " for its plan. The outrage on social media, as well as a MoveOn.org petition with several thousand signatures, doubtless have already channeled the displeasure of the community, alumni, and students with the plan. The University is accepting public feedback, but this seems to be only a political window-dressing for a plan that Whitney herself was  quoted  as saying "...is 95-98% a done deal." For over a week I debated over what form a blog on the topic would take, and while I realize that what I have to say here is little different from what I and others have already stated elsewhere, I feel the need to address thi...

How I Left Creationism

There is a discussion going on right now in the science community about whether or not we should debate creationists: it is a debate within a debate, if you will. There are good arguments on both sides, but I have to think that we should debate creationists, and we should do it as often as we can stand it. Why do I think this? Last week, I saw that Michael Shermer posted a link to a story of a woman who argued this very point. As a former creationist, it was going to debates between Shermer and Kent Hovind that began to convince her of the legitimacy of evolution and of science. I too was once a creationist. Without ever having read anything about it, without it ever having been mentioned in class (I never heard a word about evolution in high school), I was ready to pounce at the merest mention of the topic as false and godless, two of the favorite creationist talking-points. I look back at this self in amazement, at how ignorant and proud of that ignorance I was, how I failed to ...

The Hovinds...Still Poking at Straw Men

Kent Hovind, the false "Dr. Dino", and his ilk are at it again. In a new article on his website, Hovind (or whoever authored the piece, perhaps his son) claims that while creationists have no problems using miracles to explain events (a habit that perpetually makes them unfit to do real science), evolutionists criticize them for it, even though, in Hovind's mind, they rely on miracles just as much to explain their "religion" of descent through natural selection. This is, at its core, demonstrably nonsense. He claims that a "miracle" is needed to make stars and planets form out of gas, a supposed violation of Boyle's Law because there was no "outside force" acting on the gas and dust. How about gravity, Dr. Dino? That would certainly explain it, no miracles needed here. This attack is a non-sequitur. The objection has everything to do with astronomy and cosmology and nothing to do with evolution, which is the development of new species o...