Skip to main content

The Serendipity of Life

A few weeks ago I finished The Monkey's Voyage: How Improbable Journeys Shaped the History of Life by Alan de Queiroz. It was a fascinating read, detailing how the voyage of plants and animals between the continents has changed the world in which we live. Even, de Queiroz asserts, something that is both random and highly unlikely in and of itself is nearly inevitable over millions of years of life, whether it is a new plant colonizing an island or monkeys from Africa crossing into South America. The book made me think once more about how randomness shapes the history of life. If we know anything from science, it is that humans are not the inevitable outcome of evolution. Neither our dominance as a species nor even our existence were assured. Random and improbable events led us to where we are.

Think about just a few of the moments where, had something been different, life would have taken another path. Whatever natural disaster caused the human population to bottleneck around 100,000 years ago could have driven us to extinction instead. The extinction that killed the non-avian dinosaurs paved the way for the rise of mammals. Without that extinction event, perhaps our mammalian ancestors would have remained eternally in the periphery, hiding from and being hunted by dinosaurs as they continued their own evolution? Whatever event it was that sparked life might not have occurred, leaving our planet empty. Any number of events might have led us to an earth without us in it. To paraphrase Stephen Jay Gould, if one replays the tape of life over again, it is highly probable that we would not again be the end result. 

Random events have a strong influence on the history of life, and the history of our civilizations. It plays, perhaps, a larger role than we are inclined to give credit for; it is certainly something that may make us deeply uncomfortable at the very least. This must surely account at least in part for the stubborn persistence of Young-Earth Creationism well into the 21st Century. Certainly fundamentalist religious beliefs, lack of good science education, and unscrupulous people willing to take advantage of the gullible for financial gain all play a role. Yet I have to think many people refuse to accept the reality of evolution because it implies that random forces play a role in our lives, forces that are near-completely out of our control. While natural selection itself isn't random, it is random mutation in our genes that provides the material for evolution to work with. Evolution, at last, removes humans from their privileged position among the animals. We are the result of evolution, but not the inevitable outcome. 

Some may shy away from the findings of modern science because they prefer to see us as special creations; they fear an impersonal universe indifferent to our existence and imagine it a cold and joyless place. For me, however, this is a source of wonder. How amazing it is to think about what led us to this moment! How remarkable it is to ponder our existence when you think that our ancestors survived famines, plagues, predators, and extinctions, all the way back in an unbroken line to the beginnings of life. Surely knowing that the molecules that make up our bodies came from dying stars, that we are related to every living thing on this planet, from the lowest moss to the elephants and lions that roam the savanna, is adequate compensation for accepting the serendipity of life? Wonder is the appropriate response, not fear! Understanding and accepting that randomness plays a great role in the history of life is the beginning of uncovering this wonder, of discovering the magisterial history of life on this planet.  


The tree of life, depicting the inter-relatedness of all living things

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Unanswerable Questions" for Evolution Part One

Creation Ministries International has launched a new initiative, which seems a lot like all the other creationists blitzkriegs before it. With the wonderfully creative tagline of "Question Evolution", CMI intends to challenge "evolutionists" and their "indoctrination" of high school students with the supposed dogma of evolution. They also aim to  cut the population of atheists by half , presumably by challenging the "faith" that every atheist (and only atheists, no "real Christians") is supposed to hold in Darwin's great idea. The main thrust of this is a tract with fifteen "unanswerable" questions for evolutionists. I'm done putting quotation marks around the word, evolutionists; from here on out I ask my readers to recognize that it is a creationist term that is about as silly as calling someone a general relativist (accepts general relativity) or germist (for accepting germ theory). Regardless, CMI seems just as i...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...

The Absurdity/Agony of War

Science writer Mary Roach is never one to shy away from parts of science that verge on the absurd, as anyone who has read any of her books surely knows. I'd read two of her previous books, and been enchanted enough by Roach's unique combination of endless curiosity and a wry sense of humor that I rushed to lay my hands on her newest book. Grunt: The Curious Science of Humans at War will not fail in living up to the expectations that fans of her work will bring. Those who have never read her before will be hard-pressed to put down a book that I finished in a few short days.  The real joy of reading something by Mary Roach is her talent for seeking out strange areas of science that a reader might never have known about. As an investigator, she answers questions you never knew you had. Her newest work   is no exception. We discover, for instance, how the military tests the ability of a fighter jet to survive a mid-air collision with a large bird--by firing a dead chicken...