Skip to main content

You Can Make a Difference



Having been a great fan of Half the Sky, I was very excited when I found out that Nicholas Kristof and Sheryl WuDunn were coming out with another book, this time focused on how more effective charities can make a real difference around the world. My high expectations were certainly not disappointed, and the authors penned a wide-ranging book that talks about topics from how to better target your charitable giving, how charities can be more effective, and how a multitude of different approaches can effectively help solve many of the seemingly intractable problems around the world.

Sometimes we seem to be confronted with problems that are so massive that we believe solutions to be impossible. How can we tackle disease, rampant poverty and illiteracy, sex trafficking, and other problems that affect millions around the world? The very scale of the problems seems to make solutions elusive. But this would be a mistaken perspective. These problems are not only solvable, but they are being solved by active, innovative charities across the world. The way we view charity, and the way we donate are delaying solutions to the problems we face, Kristof and WuDunn argue. The solution is in learning to give more intelligently, of supporting evidence-based charitable work, and of changing the way we view nonprofits--and how they view themselves. 

We expect that there will be a silver bullet to solve the complex problems we face, but the real solutions are as complex as the problems they attempt to solve. They won't be solved overnight, either. Progress is incremental, but we would be wrong to despair and give up because of the pace of change. The Atlantic Slave Trade wasn't ended overnight, and women didn't win the right to vote in a matter of months either. Global poverty, illiteracy, and sex trafficking won't be ended after a few weeks of hard work either. 

While this is the perfect book for anyone interested in giving more effectively, I would also recommend this to anyone who, like myself, works in a non-profit. Several chapters present valuable information for helping make a charitable organization more effective, including how to frame your narrative to increase support for your organization, and this applies just as much to libraries as it does to an international charity. 

This book is ultimately uplifting because of the continual reminders that individual people can and do make a difference in non-profit work every day. Very few of us may go out and change the whole world, but if we all chip in a bit, our combined efforts can add up to large-scale changes that will improve the world we live in. And that's something worth working for. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Today I Am Ashamed of My Alma Mater

Over a week ago, my alma mater, Clarion University of Pennsylvania, released what it touted as a "bold" and "ambitious" workforce plan for the next several years. The backlash was both strong and immediate, forcing the University Administration, currently headed by President Karen Whitney, to release a " Frequently Asked Questions " for its plan. The outrage on social media, as well as a MoveOn.org petition with several thousand signatures, doubtless have already channeled the displeasure of the community, alumni, and students with the plan. The University is accepting public feedback, but this seems to be only a political window-dressing for a plan that Whitney herself was  quoted  as saying "...is 95-98% a done deal." For over a week I debated over what form a blog on the topic would take, and while I realize that what I have to say here is little different from what I and others have already stated elsewhere, I feel the need to address thi...

How I Left Creationism

There is a discussion going on right now in the science community about whether or not we should debate creationists: it is a debate within a debate, if you will. There are good arguments on both sides, but I have to think that we should debate creationists, and we should do it as often as we can stand it. Why do I think this? Last week, I saw that Michael Shermer posted a link to a story of a woman who argued this very point. As a former creationist, it was going to debates between Shermer and Kent Hovind that began to convince her of the legitimacy of evolution and of science. I too was once a creationist. Without ever having read anything about it, without it ever having been mentioned in class (I never heard a word about evolution in high school), I was ready to pounce at the merest mention of the topic as false and godless, two of the favorite creationist talking-points. I look back at this self in amazement, at how ignorant and proud of that ignorance I was, how I failed to ...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...