Skip to main content

Not All Tears Are An Evil


One of the joys of being a Middle Earth enthusiast is that, over forty years after the death of J.R.R. Tolkien, new works from his papers continue to be published - a feat remarkable for any author. No matter how regularly this happens, news of a new Tolkien book still manages to surprise as well as delight. My own joy at hearing of the forthcoming publication of Beren and Luthien, edited by Tolkien's son and literary executor Christopher Tolkien, left me quite literally jumping up and down with excitement, to the mild bemusement and possible chagrin of my co-workers.

The tale of Beren and Luthien was considered by Tolkien to be one of the most important in his mythology. Beren, a mortal man, encounters and falls in love with the immortal elf Luthien, though their union was forbidden by her father. To win his approval, the two embark on a dangerous quest to retrieve one of the Silmarils, jewels prized by the elves, from the very fortress of their great enemy. The story was one with which Tolkien personally identified; his marriage to his wife was initially forbidden by her guardian, and the names of Beren and Luthien would be engraved upon their tombstone. He began writing the first version of the legend a century ago while serving in the First World War, and he would return to the tale again and again for the remainder of his life. Whether writing in verse or in prose, or referring to the legend in other works, Tolkien was never able to finish the tale, like so much of what he wrote. Ever the perfectionist, he was never quite satisfied with the end result. The great work of Christopher Tolkien in this book is to draw together parts and versions of the tale scattered throughout his father's papers, giving the reader a view into how the tale evolved over the decades.

While I got my hands on a copy fairly soon after the release date, I took my time in reading the work. It is a book to be enjoyed slowly, not hurried. The sections of verse are beautifully written, a reflection of Tolkien's long study of language and the mythologies of Iceland and Scandinavia. Paintings and line drawings by Alan Lee, a regular illustrator of Tolkien works, adds much to the narrative. While sometimes the various pieces of the work contradict each other, that isn't a drawback. Instead, this makes Tolkien's mythos more like the myths he sought to create for England. The tale is a hauntingly beautiful one of love, loss in the face of a great evil, and yet hope even in the darkest of places, recurring themes in Tolkien's writings. Beautifully sad too is the likelihood that one of the earliest tales may well be the last; writing at ninety two, Christopher Tolkien indicates as much in the introduction. But we've come full circle in many ways - while we could always wish for more from the scribe of Middle Earth, we still have so much. It will have to be enough. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Today I Am Ashamed of My Alma Mater

Over a week ago, my alma mater, Clarion University of Pennsylvania, released what it touted as a "bold" and "ambitious" workforce plan for the next several years. The backlash was both strong and immediate, forcing the University Administration, currently headed by President Karen Whitney, to release a " Frequently Asked Questions " for its plan. The outrage on social media, as well as a MoveOn.org petition with several thousand signatures, doubtless have already channeled the displeasure of the community, alumni, and students with the plan. The University is accepting public feedback, but this seems to be only a political window-dressing for a plan that Whitney herself was  quoted  as saying "...is 95-98% a done deal." For over a week I debated over what form a blog on the topic would take, and while I realize that what I have to say here is little different from what I and others have already stated elsewhere, I feel the need to address thi...

How I Left Creationism

There is a discussion going on right now in the science community about whether or not we should debate creationists: it is a debate within a debate, if you will. There are good arguments on both sides, but I have to think that we should debate creationists, and we should do it as often as we can stand it. Why do I think this? Last week, I saw that Michael Shermer posted a link to a story of a woman who argued this very point. As a former creationist, it was going to debates between Shermer and Kent Hovind that began to convince her of the legitimacy of evolution and of science. I too was once a creationist. Without ever having read anything about it, without it ever having been mentioned in class (I never heard a word about evolution in high school), I was ready to pounce at the merest mention of the topic as false and godless, two of the favorite creationist talking-points. I look back at this self in amazement, at how ignorant and proud of that ignorance I was, how I failed to ...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...