Skip to main content

What's Out There?

Last week I finished up a short online course through the University of Edinburgh on astrobiology, the science concerned with the possibility of the existence of life on other planets. It was fascinating, if a bit short at only five weeks with a handful of lectures each week. While it is probably easy for the ignorant to misunderstand and mock this discipline, the question of whether or not life exists on other worlds is a legitimate and interesting field, and it encompasses so many smaller areas of study. Astrobiology seeks to understand how life arose here on Earth in the first place, wondering how it started, what early earth was like--and as far as that goes, what the first life looked like. It also studies life in great extremes, whether extremes of heat or of pressure, to try to grasp the limits to life in order to understand where life might possibly exist (as an aside, were you aware that microbial life survived in space for over a year, in one experiment?). Along with that, it looks at stars and planets to find locations where the conditions amenable to life might possibly exist, and the scientists in this field wonder what form life might take, whether or not it would be intelligent, and how we might contact it (or it us, for that matter). 

These questions are, of course, ones that are hotly disputed. The very basic question, is there life out there, is greatly contested. Some think it very likely, that life is even bound to be abundant in the vastness of the universe. Others, like Peter Ward in his book Rare Earth, assert that life is rare in the universe, if it exists at all outside of Earth. If it does exist, then the natural next question to address is what this life will look like. The question of what shape it will take is a fascinating one, though it seems unlikely that alien life will be the stereotypical little green men. Sadly enough, it seems just as unlikely that intelligent extraterrestrials will come in the form of Doctor Who. If we find life that is advanced beyond bacteria, even life that is advanced and intelligent, what would it look like? Could it be a hive mind, like the "buggers" of Orson Scott Card's Ender's Game? Would it be hostile, as the aliens of our sci-fi horror fantasies are? No less a person than Stephen Hawking suggested that it might not be wise to try and contact alien life lest they turn out to be hostile. Even if we knew this to be true, the natural curiosity of humanity will push us to try, forever not satisfied by not knowing--one of the healthiest instincts we have!

It is too early to tell which side is correct, but I am optimistic that, given the great vastness of our own galaxy, to say nothing of the universe, it is inevitable that life exists in some form somewhere. Where that is, and what shape it takes, I do not know, though it will probably be bacterial and, as Richard Dawkins asserts, shaped by the same forces of evolution that shape life here on earth. I myself am not an astronomer, but I sometimes curse all the artificial lights of civilization that pollute the sky and keep me from more regularly seeing the full range of stars that are visible to the naked eye, as our ancestors once saw on every clear night. When you can see that, when you look up into the endless sky and see all the stars, and know that for every star you can see there are millions upon millions of stars beyond those that you can't, many of which have planets circling around them, even then you get only a glimpse of the true vastness that is out there. When I see that I cannot believe that in all that space there is only life here. It would seem a terrible waste otherwise.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Unanswerable Questions" for Evolution Part One

Creation Ministries International has launched a new initiative, which seems a lot like all the other creationists blitzkriegs before it. With the wonderfully creative tagline of "Question Evolution", CMI intends to challenge "evolutionists" and their "indoctrination" of high school students with the supposed dogma of evolution. They also aim to  cut the population of atheists by half , presumably by challenging the "faith" that every atheist (and only atheists, no "real Christians") is supposed to hold in Darwin's great idea. The main thrust of this is a tract with fifteen "unanswerable" questions for evolutionists. I'm done putting quotation marks around the word, evolutionists; from here on out I ask my readers to recognize that it is a creationist term that is about as silly as calling someone a general relativist (accepts general relativity) or germist (for accepting germ theory). Regardless, CMI seems just as i...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...

The Absurdity/Agony of War

Science writer Mary Roach is never one to shy away from parts of science that verge on the absurd, as anyone who has read any of her books surely knows. I'd read two of her previous books, and been enchanted enough by Roach's unique combination of endless curiosity and a wry sense of humor that I rushed to lay my hands on her newest book. Grunt: The Curious Science of Humans at War will not fail in living up to the expectations that fans of her work will bring. Those who have never read her before will be hard-pressed to put down a book that I finished in a few short days.  The real joy of reading something by Mary Roach is her talent for seeking out strange areas of science that a reader might never have known about. As an investigator, she answers questions you never knew you had. Her newest work   is no exception. We discover, for instance, how the military tests the ability of a fighter jet to survive a mid-air collision with a large bird--by firing a dead chicken...