Skip to main content

Think Critically!

It is easy to get frustrated, and never more so when witnessing the absolute gullibility of humanity. We all know, of course, about the strange beliefs that some people hold, that aliens abduct and probe humans, that aliens built the pyramids, that planes disappear in the Bermuda Triangle and that Bigfoot is walking around somewhere in the undiscovered wilds. We may shake our heads at the fact that some people swallow an endless number of conspiracy theories, seeing the hidden hand of the Freemasons, the Illuminati, the Jews, or some other secretive power behind the workings of the world. We rightly mock and ridicule anyone who seriously believes that FEMA is setting up detention camps, just waiting for a crisis to allow them to impose a fascistic "New World Order" on the United States, or that the Sandy Hook school shooting was a false flag operation. These are easy targets, however, and only the tip of the iceberg when it comes to wrong and foolish things that we believe.

The plain fact is that we all believe something that is ridiculous or just wrong. We simply don't realize that this belief is mistaken, in many cases. It seems obvious, but if we thought that something we believed was demonstrably untrue, really thought it, we would stop believing that. But we can cling to our beliefs with remarkable tenacity, even in the face of overwhelming evidence that we are wrong. Take climate change for example. Those who dogmatically reject that our climate is warming and that this is caused by humans burning fossil fuels will deny or rationalize away any evidence that their beliefs are wrong. This denial of reality isn't nearly as harmless as, say, the belief that Elvis lives; it has real consequences on our policies and thus on the world in which we live, delaying necessary action to mitigate and reverse the damage we are doing. 

When it comes to evidence, we are quick to apply critical scrutiny to new information that contradicts our beliefs and just as quick to accept new information that confirms what we already believe. Our confirmation bias defends and protects our most deeply-held beliefs from the scrutiny that they deserve, whether they have a basis in reality or not. This is not a criticism of specific ideologies, though some systems of belief may certainly be said to have a greater basis in reality than others, but an observation made by many others well before me. It is a warning to us to be careful, a reminder that we are pre-disposed to this behavior. We owe it to ourselves to try to re-examine our beliefs in light of new evidence, to be open to changing our beliefs if it seems warranted. I believe that we would be a healthier society, a healthier world, if more of us could transcend the closed-mindedness that seems to be our natural disposition as a species, and a move towards that ideal begins with each of us.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Unanswerable Questions" for Evolution Part One

Creation Ministries International has launched a new initiative, which seems a lot like all the other creationists blitzkriegs before it. With the wonderfully creative tagline of "Question Evolution", CMI intends to challenge "evolutionists" and their "indoctrination" of high school students with the supposed dogma of evolution. They also aim to  cut the population of atheists by half , presumably by challenging the "faith" that every atheist (and only atheists, no "real Christians") is supposed to hold in Darwin's great idea. The main thrust of this is a tract with fifteen "unanswerable" questions for evolutionists. I'm done putting quotation marks around the word, evolutionists; from here on out I ask my readers to recognize that it is a creationist term that is about as silly as calling someone a general relativist (accepts general relativity) or germist (for accepting germ theory). Regardless, CMI seems just as i...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...

The Absurdity/Agony of War

Science writer Mary Roach is never one to shy away from parts of science that verge on the absurd, as anyone who has read any of her books surely knows. I'd read two of her previous books, and been enchanted enough by Roach's unique combination of endless curiosity and a wry sense of humor that I rushed to lay my hands on her newest book. Grunt: The Curious Science of Humans at War will not fail in living up to the expectations that fans of her work will bring. Those who have never read her before will be hard-pressed to put down a book that I finished in a few short days.  The real joy of reading something by Mary Roach is her talent for seeking out strange areas of science that a reader might never have known about. As an investigator, she answers questions you never knew you had. Her newest work   is no exception. We discover, for instance, how the military tests the ability of a fighter jet to survive a mid-air collision with a large bird--by firing a dead chicken...