Skip to main content

Telling Stories

Why do I write? Why do I take the time to write things down that a handful of people will read...and in the case of my writing outside of this blog, at best one or two other people will read? Some days when the writing is hard, when the words just won't come and even a sentence is a struggle to piece together, it seems better just to give up and go read. But I always come back. So why do I do it?

A few years ago I read a book about our need to tell stories, The Storytelling Animal by Jonathan Gottschall. It was a fascinating read, other than a completely unwarranted and baseless attack on the Sherlock Holmes stories. To tell stories, in Gottshall's rendering, is to be human. It's what we do. Everything in our lives is based around telling stories. A little thought on our history is enough to support his thesis; from cave paintings and oral storytelling to Shakespeare, Wilde, and YouTube web series and social gatherings, our lives revolve around telling and hearing stories. It is a creative impulse that we seem bound to give voice to. 

It's interesting that in doing some browsing before writing this blog, I came across a survey asking writers why they write. A plethora of answers was the result, with no single reason winning a majority. 16% of the respondents, however, answered that they write because they have to! Not for fame, glory, or professional awards. They write because there is no choice in the matter, and this is a response I agree with. If someone assured me today with absolute certainty that nothing I've written, not a one of the short stories or longer works, would ever see print (disregarding, for a moment, self-publishing), I would still keep writing. I have to. I'm reminded of the character of Mike Noonan in Stephen King's Bag of Bones. Noonan, a writer, described how at the beginning of his career his head was filled with stories that ceaselessly hounded him, stories wanting to be told. He wrote book after book, until he had told all the stories that were within him. Sometimes I feel much the same way. The stories are there, and I have no choice but to tell them. Some I'm ready to tell now. For others, I know it isn't yet time. They will have to wait a little while. Publication is irrelevant; the stories must be told. Even if the stories end up being only for me, the effort spent in writing and editing was worth it. They still matter. 

There is some joy in the act of creation, in making something that is new to the world, whether it is writing or painting or sculpting or acting or whatever other creative act one engages in. There is struggle, yes, but those days where the act of making something new is hard make the good days all the better, the days where the words just flow and everything works. Even on the bad days, I never seriously think about quitting. For me there is no option but to write. A life without writing seems unthinkable.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

"Unanswerable Questions" for Evolution Part One

Creation Ministries International has launched a new initiative, which seems a lot like all the other creationists blitzkriegs before it. With the wonderfully creative tagline of "Question Evolution", CMI intends to challenge "evolutionists" and their "indoctrination" of high school students with the supposed dogma of evolution. They also aim to  cut the population of atheists by half , presumably by challenging the "faith" that every atheist (and only atheists, no "real Christians") is supposed to hold in Darwin's great idea. The main thrust of this is a tract with fifteen "unanswerable" questions for evolutionists. I'm done putting quotation marks around the word, evolutionists; from here on out I ask my readers to recognize that it is a creationist term that is about as silly as calling someone a general relativist (accepts general relativity) or germist (for accepting germ theory). Regardless, CMI seems just as i...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...

The Absurdity/Agony of War

Science writer Mary Roach is never one to shy away from parts of science that verge on the absurd, as anyone who has read any of her books surely knows. I'd read two of her previous books, and been enchanted enough by Roach's unique combination of endless curiosity and a wry sense of humor that I rushed to lay my hands on her newest book. Grunt: The Curious Science of Humans at War will not fail in living up to the expectations that fans of her work will bring. Those who have never read her before will be hard-pressed to put down a book that I finished in a few short days.  The real joy of reading something by Mary Roach is her talent for seeking out strange areas of science that a reader might never have known about. As an investigator, she answers questions you never knew you had. Her newest work   is no exception. We discover, for instance, how the military tests the ability of a fighter jet to survive a mid-air collision with a large bird--by firing a dead chicken...