Skip to main content

The Wonder of it All

Last week National Geographic released video from what is being hailed as the first simulation of the evolution of the universe. In what must have taken thousands of hours of work, this depiction of the universe shows the evolution of early galaxies, beginning a mere twelve million years after the big bang occurred. Take a look:


One can hardly help but be moved by the sight of it, of seeing the universe unfold before our very eyes. No simulation is perfect, of course, but as a representation of the best science available at present it still carries with it a great majesty. Seeing the passage of such an immense length of time is humbling; it reminds us of the brevity of our own lives and puts the hubris of humanity firmly in its place. This is one of the joys of science, the ability that science has to convey wonder to us, from the evolution of the universe and the images from the Hubble Telescope to the sense of deep time that comes from looking at the rocks and fossils of our own planet. The findings of science often have the ability to stop our minds with the impact of it, as we attempt to come to terms with things well beyond a normal human lifespan, beyond even the lifespan of civilizations. Remind yourself, for instance, that more time separated the Diplodocus from the T. rex than separates the T. rex from us. Sixty five million years have passed since the Tyrannosaurus died out, but Diplodocus went extinct 150 million years ago, over one hundred million years before T. rex walked the earth. 

Science has given us cars and iPhones, put humans into orbit and cured countless diseases that used to fell millions, but it has also given us an incredible amount of wonder, a fantastic fringe-benefit to all the other good that it has brought us. Would that more people took as much joy in the findings of science as we do in our other pursuits! Perhaps this is a failing of science and many science-minded individuals; in spite of our best efforts, it's a safe bet that a majority of people do not care at all about the wonder of science even while they enjoy all its benefits. That so many people are either unaware or indifferent to the story science reveals is a true sadness. They inhabit a pauperized world, especially the young-earth creationists who live in a land that they've conjured up through their stubborn denial of scientific fact. The world is so much grander than they realize, so much more amazing than they will allow themselves to admit. We are truly, as Carl Sagan said, lucky to live in such a time as this, where we are traveling to other worlds. We are incredibly fortunate to live in an age where science has revealed so many of the secrets that were once hidden. Yet so much remains to be unveiled, and this is the most exciting prospect of all. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Today I Am Ashamed of My Alma Mater

Over a week ago, my alma mater, Clarion University of Pennsylvania, released what it touted as a "bold" and "ambitious" workforce plan for the next several years. The backlash was both strong and immediate, forcing the University Administration, currently headed by President Karen Whitney, to release a " Frequently Asked Questions " for its plan. The outrage on social media, as well as a MoveOn.org petition with several thousand signatures, doubtless have already channeled the displeasure of the community, alumni, and students with the plan. The University is accepting public feedback, but this seems to be only a political window-dressing for a plan that Whitney herself was  quoted  as saying "...is 95-98% a done deal." For over a week I debated over what form a blog on the topic would take, and while I realize that what I have to say here is little different from what I and others have already stated elsewhere, I feel the need to address thi...

How I Left Creationism

There is a discussion going on right now in the science community about whether or not we should debate creationists: it is a debate within a debate, if you will. There are good arguments on both sides, but I have to think that we should debate creationists, and we should do it as often as we can stand it. Why do I think this? Last week, I saw that Michael Shermer posted a link to a story of a woman who argued this very point. As a former creationist, it was going to debates between Shermer and Kent Hovind that began to convince her of the legitimacy of evolution and of science. I too was once a creationist. Without ever having read anything about it, without it ever having been mentioned in class (I never heard a word about evolution in high school), I was ready to pounce at the merest mention of the topic as false and godless, two of the favorite creationist talking-points. I look back at this self in amazement, at how ignorant and proud of that ignorance I was, how I failed to ...

What Creationists Don't Understand

There are quite a number of concepts that one could successfully argue that creationists fail to understand; whether this is out of a simple lack of knowledge or willful ignorance is hard to say and certainly can't be generalized to every creationist. Some, the everyday creationist, I would like to think simply haven't been exposed to the evidence. Others, the holders of Ph.D's in various fields, especially in the sciences, who happily reject evolutionary theory are willfully ignorant (John Whitmore comes to mind). But I think there is one idea that creationists of all stripes simply fail to understand; evolution is based on solid, visible evidence. Evolution is not some tenant of a "science religion" that descended down to Darwin from on high, it is an explanatory framework based on quite a lot of facts and mountains of evidence. It is evidence that leads to the conclusions of evolution, that life changes over time and, given the long history of the earth, all ...